The cat train.. š pic.twitter.com/AogmspDEnh
— Buitengebieden (@buitengebieden) May 19, 2023
Heh!
Middle Easterners Begin Painting Transgender Flag Colors On Doorposts To Avoid Biden Drone Strikes https://t.co/T2uvyx4P2s pic.twitter.com/hcFfiTtJ21
— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) May 19, 2023
Liberal journalist? No. Liberal activist. She is not a journalist.
CNN’s Christiane Amanpour calls out boss Chris Licht, offers stunning rebuke of Trump town hall
Trump is the leading Republican candidate for president. She seems to be saying that CNN, a nominal news outlet presumably practicing journalism, should not have Trump on their channel. She apparently thinks Trump will trick Americans into voting for him through some evil magic, and it is her duty and the duty of CNN to prevent Americans from listening to Trump.
This is called delusion. It is a symptom of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS). This woman is sick with TDS. The disease is in an advanced state.
Green garbage on millions of acres of federal land without congress or normal law making procedures.
New BLM Rules On āConservation Leasesā Will Fundamentally Transform Public Land Management
“…The new BLM rule introducing so-called conservation leasing will likely become the administrationās vehicle for locking up federal property…
…āUnder this regulation, āconservationā would be a āuseā just like mining or timber,ā McDonald told The Federalist, adding that āthe devil is in the details.ā…”
Chip Roy addresses a lot of issues…
Riley Gaines describes when Will Thomas Undressed in Front of Her. This is a total disgrace. A shameful event for our country. Women’s sports and women in general must be protected.
“…A 6 foot 4 male walks in, disrobes, and is fully intact with male genitalia while we’re simultaneously undressing. As 18 to 22 year old girls and there was nothing we could do about it… How is this allowed to happen?…”
Related. Trans freaks formed a mob and tried to intimidate her:
— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) May 16, 2023
Related:
More FBI malfeasance comes to light…
FBI Searched Jan. 6 Rioters and George Floyd Demonstrators in Spy Database
“…Agency used foreign spying law to gather intelligence in what one lawmaker called āshocking abusesā…”
Related:
Whistleblowers claim FBI wrongfully targeted gun owners, concerned parents
Related:
FBI targeted gun owners via Bank of America
Bank of America gave a list to the FBI of anyone who used BofA credit/debit cards in the DC area between Jan 5-7th, 2021 – regardless of whether they participated in the events of Jan. 6th. pic.twitter.com/C0zBA1AGmy
— Rep. Dan Bishop (@RepDanBishop) May 18, 2023
Related:
Jim Brown, RIP
I don’t agree with either men on most policy positions, but I like them both. I take RFK Jr. seriously as a Democrat candidate for president.
There needs to be a Durham investigation into J6. How it started. How it developed. Government involvement.
Ground Breaking News:
FBI whistleblower testified that the FBI wouldnāt allow OVER 11,000+ of J6 footage to be released because it would expose undercover agents committing crimes inside Capitol.
JANUARY 6TH WAS A SETUP!!!!
The FBI is trying to cover its involvement. pic.twitter.com/JifobwVlUi
— Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen_1) May 18, 2023
The feds led the Jan 6 protesters into a trap at the Capitol, thatās why they wonāt release all the tapes and wonāt say how many people they had undercover in the crowd
— Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) May 19, 2023
Democrat governance…
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1659486571161341953
Related:
Washington Official Explodes When Board Member Opposes Sex Offender Joining Group

Woke, racially obsessed medicine. Can it get worse?
Esteemed medical journal calls for segregated med school.
We live in the age of stupid transmogrifying into the age of the absurd.
Headline of the day – You can’t make it up edition…
Green stupidity imposed by incompetent ideological extremists.
Just so weāre clear ā New York has āNo Plan Bā for the power plants theyāre shutting down
“…As part of last weekās budget deal, Gov. Kathy Hochul and the Legislature ordered the New York Power Authority to shut down all its fossil-fuel plants in just seven years ā even though gas-fired plants supply nearly half the stateās electricity.
At the same time, they banned gas (for stoves and heating) in all new buildings by 2029, forcing them to be all-electric.
And by 2035, the only new cars sold here must also be purely electric…”
These measures will likely cause significant disruption to the lives of millions of people that live in the area. But don’t worry, these Democrats are going to save the planet from global warming. So they are doing this for all of us. Absolute stupidity.
Related:
This is about elite virtue signaling and power over the great underclass. The importation of large numbers of underclass people more accepting of elite dictates than Americans is another story. The Democrat elite and some Republicans view themselves as above the rest of the country and they intend to impose their will on us because they are smarter and know better. Exceptions will be made for preferred pets. Here is an example of a perfect elite liberal pet:
Celebrity chef Jose Andres exempted from Palo Alto gas stove ban
Jonathan Turley on the Durham report…
The Immunity Option: How Congress Could Have the Final Say on the Russian Collusion Scandal
“…For those interested in the truth about the Russian collusion investigation, the Durham ReportĀ has hundreds of pages of details of the alliance of political, government and media figures behind arguably the greatest hoax in U.S. history. The only thing it does not have is an actual indictment or true accountability for the critical players in an effort to derail an American presidency. Indeed, some witnesses associated with the Clinton campaign appear to have refused to cooperate with the investigation. Congress could change that.
Buried in the detailed account is a little noticed footnote stating that Clinton General Counsel Marc Elias ādeclined to be voluntarily interviewed by the Office.ā Likewise, Durham noted that āno one at Fusion GPS ⦠would agree to voluntarily speak with the Officeā while both the DNC andĀ Clinton campaignĀ invoked privileges to refuse to answer certain questions.
It is not clear whether Durham was able to get a full account from these sources, but he was still able to establish the details on how this unprecedented political hit job succeeded despite a lack of evidence. In the course of that account, Durham demolished the prior claims of Democratic members like Adam Schiff and many in the media. Durham concludes that the investigation should never have been launched and that the whole effort was based on āraw, unanalyzed, and uncorroboratedā information.
It turns out that the āpee-tapeā was the creation of a Clinton operative without any factual basis despite years of the media (and former FBI Director James Comey) referencing the false salacious claim.
It turns out that Trump was correct that the FBI did spy on his campaign despite years of mocking denials in the media.
Indeed, Trump was right that this was a manufactured hoax engineered by the Clinton campaign, weaponized by the FBI, and then promulgated by the media.
As expected, the media has imposed another virtual blackout on coverage of the report other than to deny that there is anything new for the public to see. For those of us concerned aboutĀ the rise of a type of state media in the United States, the report and its coverage has only magnified those concerns…”
Only 6 more years. Can Fetterman make it? The Democrats made him a committee chairman!

John Fetterman speaks at a press conference on the debt ceiling negotiations. pic.twitter.com/yiXDkFQtMY
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) May 18, 2023
Harriet Hageman on FBI malfeasance…
Harriet M. Hageman is š„ pic.twitter.com/q5gLcCZPET
— Dr. PMS (@2timeguy) May 18, 2023
Don Surber debunks the latest Obama talking points…
Justice Gorsuch on Title 42 orders and rule by decree…
“…Since March 2020, we may have experienced the greatest intrusions on civil liberties in the peacetime history of this country. Executive officials across the country issued emergency decrees on a breathtaking scale. Governors and local leaders imposed lockdown orders forcing people to remain in their homes. They shuttered businesses and schools, public and private. They closed churches even as they allowed casinos and other favored businesses to carry on. They threatened violators not just with civil penalties but with criminal sanctions too.
They surveilled church parking lots, recorded license plates, and issued notices warning that attendance at even outdoor services satisfying all state social-distancing and hygiene requirements could amount to criminal conduct. They divided cities and neighborhoods into color-coded zones, forced individuals to fight for their freedoms in court on emergency timetables, and then changed their color-coded schemes when defeat in court seemed imminent.
Federal executive officials entered the act too. Not just with emergency immigration decrees. They deployed a public-health agency to regulate landlord-tenant relations nationwide. They used a workplace-safety agency to issue a vaccination mandate for most working Americans. They threatened to fire noncompliant employees, and warned that service members who refused to vaccinate might face dishonorable discharge and confinement. Along the way, it seems federal officials may have pressured social-media companies to suppress information about pandemic policies with which they disagreed.
While executive officials issued new emergency decrees at a furious pace, state legislatures and Congressāthe bodies normally responsible for adopting our lawsātoo often fell silent. Courts bound to protect our liberties addressed a fewābut hardly allāof the intrusions upon them. In some cases, like this one, courts even allowed themselves to be used to perpetuate emergency public-health decrees for collateral purposes, itself a form of emergency-lawmaking-by-litigation.
Doubtless, many lessons can be learned from this chapter in our history, and hopefully serious efforts will be made to study it. One lesson might be this: Fear and the desire for safety are powerful forces. They can lead to a clamor for actionāalmost any actionāas long as someone does something to address a perceived threat. A leader or an expert who claims he can fix everything, if only we do exactly as he says, can prove an irresistible force.
We do not need to confront a bayonet, we need only a nudge, before we willingly abandon the nicety of requiring laws to be adopted by our legislative representatives and accept rule by decree. Along the way, we will accede to the loss of many cherished civil libertiesāthe right to worship freely, to debate public policy without censorship, to gather with friends and family, or simply to leave our homes. We may even cheer on those who ask us to disregard our normal lawmaking processes and forfeit our personal freedoms. Of course, this is no new story. Even the ancients warned that democracies can degenerate toward autocracy in the face of fear [citing Aristotle’s Politics].
But maybe we have learned another lesson too. The concentration of power in the hands of so few may be efficient and sometimes popular. But it does not tend toward sound government. However wise one person or his advisors may be, that is no substitute for the wisdom of the whole of the American people that can be tapped in the legislative process.
Decisions produced by those who indulge no criticism are rarely as good as those produced after robust and uncensored debate. Decisions announced on the fly are rarely as wise as those that come after careful deliberation. Decisions made by a few often yield unintended consequences that may be avoided when more are consulted. Autocracies have always suffered these defects. Maybe, hopefully, we have relearned these lessons too.
In the 1970s, Congress studied the use of emergency decrees. It observed that they can allow executive authorities to tap into extraordinary powers. Congress also observed that emergency decrees have a habit of long outliving the crises that generate them; some federal emergency proclamations, Congress noted, had remained in effect for years or decades after the emergency in question had passed.
At the same time, Congress recognized that quick unilateral executive action is sometimes necessary and permitted in our constitutional order. In an effort to balance these considerations and ensure a more normal operation of our laws and a firmer protection of our liberties, Congress adopted a number of new guardrails in the National Emergencies Act.
Despite that law, the number of declared emergencies has only grown in the ensuing years. And it is hard not to wonder whether, after nearly a half century and in light of our Nation’s recent experience, another look is warranted. It is hard not to wonder, too, whether state legislatures might profitably reexamine the proper scope of emergency executive powers at the state level.
At the very least, one can hope that the Judiciary will not soon again allow itself to be part of the problem by permitting litigants to manipulate our docket to perpetuate a decree designed for one emergency to address another. Make no mistakeādecisive executive action is sometimes necessary and appropriate. But if emergency decrees promise to solve some problems, they threaten to generate others. And rule by indefinite emergency edict risks leaving all of us with a shell of a democracy and civil liberties just as hollow…”
First grade graduate…
That's how you celebrate graduating 1st grade https://t.co/XzTjOA6pna
— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) May 18, 2023


