Wes Moore Won a Key White House Post Claiming He Was ‘Touted as a Foremost Expert’ on Radical Islam and Was Studying for an Oxford PhD—But His Thesis Is ‘Missing’ and There’s No Evidence He Was Ever a Doctoral Student.

Columbia University Faculty Behaving Badly

“…A new report out of Columbia University documents abuses of faculty prerogatives and general outrageous misbehavior on the part of full-time faculty, instructors, and graduate assistants. Academic freedom does not include being abusive to students, using your classes for political organizing, teaching material unrelated to your classes ideological reasons, and otherwise treating your classroom position as if its your personal platform to pursue an ideological agenda…”

Josh Blackman: “Brazenly Partisan” Judges Scrutinize Trump’s Mind, But Refuse To Explain Themselves.

MTG posing with lunatic code pink liberal

Larry Sabato: Trump’s Viciousness, If It Is Humanly Possible, Is Getting Worse

Liberal Mental Disorder is real and widespread among the Liberal Elite.

Trump is Hitler, worse than Hitler, Hitler times 2.

Mamdani: “I’m Prepared For Any Consequence” For Standing Up To ICE For New Yorkers, Because That’s My Job

Related: Local mayor decides his city has separate laws from the United States

Mamdani: NYPD Will Not Assist ICE In Enforcement, They Will Be “Following The Policies Of Sanctuary City Law”

1850’s Democrat redux.

Jake Tapper: Reporting Accurately On Trump’s Quite Obvious Aging Is Neither Seditious Nor Treasonous

Just like you did with Biden, right?

Bevan: Media Wants So Badly To Sell “Enfeebled Trump” Story, With No Hint of Irony

Actress From Horror Hit ‘Weapons’ Says Drag Queens Love Child-Snatching Witch Character

Shock Therapy for Our Lawless Legal System

Deranged, race-obsessed, idiot.

In Astounding Coincidence the “Experts” Cannot Explain, US Oil Production Hits Record Highs as Gasoline Prices, Inexpicably, Fall to Lowest Levels Since the Chinese Engineered Bioweapon

NPR: Trump Defending Western Civilization = Racist

Need more?

Rachel Maddow Demands CBS, Paramount Skydance Reverse Stephen Colbert Cancellation

I could go on and on.

Nihilistic, self-absorbed, out-of-touch, stupid.

We live in the age of stupid.

Heritage Foundation’s Amy Swearer: 14th Amendment Authors Would Be ‘Shocked’ About Birthright Citizenship

“…The key phrase here, is, ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ It creates a second condition for birthright citizenship beyond merely being born on American soil,” Swearer said, adding that this “also raises another question: ‘Who is born subject to U.S. jurisdiction?’”

The legal fellow pointed out that the 14th Amendment “was ratified in 1868, just three years after the end of the Civil War.”

“Its purpose was to rectify the infamous 1857 Supreme Court decision, Dred Scott v. Sandford, in which the court declared that black Americans were not and could never be citizens,” she said.

Despite slavery having been abolished, this Supreme Court decision remained “the law of the land,” making it so that “black Americans were still not citizens, even though they were no longer slaves, Swearer explained.

“The 14th Amendment resolved the issue once and for all,” the Heritage Foundation senior legal fellow added, noting that newly freed slaves and their children “were certainly born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.”

“While the 14th Amendment resolved the issue as it related to race, its authors would have been shocked to learn that we now interpret these words to make citizens of virtually anyone born on U.S. soil under all circumstances,” Swearer said.

The legal scholar then pointed to Yale law professor William C. Robinson, who explained in his 1875 legal treatise that the 14th Amendment grants citizenship only to those born within the jurisdiction and allegiance of the United States.

At minimum, this is a condition that requires lawful permanent residence in the United States, Swearer noted, adding, “This was also the original understanding of the federal government.”

In citing an example, Swearer mentioned an incident in 1890 when Irish national Mary Devereaux gave birth while awaiting immigration approval in New York.

“Authorities later denied her immigration application,” Swearer said, adding that “because Devereaux wasn’t eligible for lawful admission to the U.S., her U.S.-born daughter was not recognized as a U.S. citizen” and “both mother and child were sent back to Ireland.”

The legal fellow noted that the 1898 case United States v. Wong Kim Ark is often cited as a means for justifying universal birthright citizenship.

The case involved an incident in which Wong Kim Ark — a son of Chinese immigrants who was born and raised in the United States — was detained and threatened with deportation upon returning home from a visit to China.

Wong then sued the United States, arguing that he was an American citizen by birth, and the Supreme Court agreed.

“While this decision is often cited as proof that the 14th amendment mandates universal birthright citizenship, it proves nothing of the sort,” Swearer said, adding that the Wong decision “was meant to undo the immoral Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.”

The Chinese Exclusion Act had prohibited Chinese immigrants from becoming American citizens, “no matter how long they lawfully lived, worked, and raised their families here,” the legal scholar explained, adding that Wong’s parents had been “lawful permanent residents.”

The Supreme Court’s 1898 decision meant, “Congress could prevent lawful Chinese immigrants from becoming naturalized citizens, but it could not subject their U.S.-born and raised children to perpetual alien status because of their race,” she added.

“Universal birthright citizenship isn’t required by the 14th Amendment’s text or historical context, it’s inconsistent with the earliest legal interpretations of the amendment, and it isn’t compelled by Supreme Court precedent,” Swearer asserted…”

Ketanji Argues Presidents Should Not Be Able to Fire Government ‘Experts’

Is Nick Fuentes A Foreign Op? New Evidence Suggests Maybe

“…The study analyzed Fuentes’ social media activity. It found engagement patterns the researchers say are consistent with bot-farm amplification rather than genuine audience support. The Network Contagion Research Institute released the report Monday in partnership with Rutgers University’s Social Perception Lab…”

Nick Fuentes Seems Popular—Until You See Where His Clicks Come From

 

Welfare Fraud In Blue Cities: How Pervasive Is The Kleptocracy?

“…The Times piece appears to have given the cue to the rest of the liberal establishment that it was now OK to break the omertà previously in effect against covering the Minnesota scandal. Suddenly the story is everywhere.

Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the Minnesota story has been the revelation of total abdication by the state’s Governor (Tim Walz) and Attorney General (Keith Ellison) of any role in catching or prosecuting the fraudsters. The frauds occurred in programs largely funded by the federal government, but administered by the State of Minnesota. The State is the one that actually paid the checks to the crooks. Yet all of the investigations and prosecutions have been done by the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s office. It appears that Walz and Ellison could not have been less interested in prosecuting.

One might ask whether allowing fraud like this to fester is actually part of the business model of Walz and Ellison, and of the Democrat-Farmer-Labor Party (as the Democratic Party is known in Minnesota). Somalis are a key voting bloc for Minnesota’s DFL. Of the billion plus dollars of government money going to the fraudsters, might any of it have been diverted to fund DFL electoral activities? Although I haven’t seen specific reporting on this aspect, it is hard to imagine that none of it did…”