Joe Biden Actually Said This — ‘Winter of Death is coming for the Unvaccinated’

Fuck you, jerk off.

Related:

FDA to permanently allow abortion pills by mail

In this time of crisis, we've seen that Democratic politicians are authoritarians. They will control your life, they will order you to obey, and they will destroy you if you don't.

No petty tyrant has the right to order you to undergo a medical procedure! pic.twitter.com/PmH8DyoXQc

— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) December 15, 2021

This is becoming a regular happening during speeches. It is no wonder he is not allowed to interact with reporters except in carefully scripted and controlled environments.

It is obvious to me that he is experiencing age onset cognitive issues.

DC Bar Restores Convicted FBI Russiagate Forger to ‘Good Standing’ Amid Irregularities and Leniency.

“…A former senior FBI lawyer who falsified a surveillance document in the Trump-Russia investigation has been restored as a member in “good standing” by the District of Columbia Bar Association even though he has yet to finish serving out his probation as a convicted felon, according to disciplinary records obtained by RealClearInvestigations.

The move is the latest in a series of exceptions the bar has made for Kevin Clinesmith, who pleaded guilty in August 2020 to doctoring an email used to justify a surveillance warrant targeting former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

Clinesmith was sentenced to 12 months probation last January. But the D.C. Bar did not seek his disbarment, as is customary after lawyers are convicted of serious crimes involving the administration of justice. In this case, it did not even initiate disciplinary proceedings against him until February of this year — five months after he pleaded guilty and four days after RealClearInvestigations first reported he had not been disciplined. After the negative publicity, the bar temporarily suspended Clinesmith pending a review and hearing. Then in September, the court that oversees the bar and imposes sanctions agreed with its recommendation to let Clinesmith off suspension with time served; the bar, in turn, restored his status to “active member” in “good standing.”

Before quietly making that decision, however, records indicate the bar did not check with his probation officer to see if he had violated the terms of his sentence or if he had completed the community service requirement of volunteering 400 hours…”

This is corruption. It is because Democrats occupy our federal bureaucracy and many state bureaucracies and are simply unaccountable. Media averts it’s eyes and ignores this or trumpets it as justice, because media is equally corrupt. It is an outrage.

Joe Biden Flying Illegal Aliens, Deported by Trump, Back to U.S.

“…President Joe Biden’s administration is flying illegal aliens, previously deported by former President Donald Trump’s administration, back to the United States.

This week, National Public Radio (NPR) reported that two previously deported illegal aliens, Claudio Rojas of Argentina and Jean Montrevil of Haiti, have since been brought back to the U.S. after they claimed that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency retaliated against them for their open borders advocacy.

Before his 2019 deportation, Rojas had lived as an illegal alien for 19 years while Montrevil was deported in 2018 following more than a decade in the U.S.

Attorneys for the illegal aliens are now demanding that both be given amnesty as reparations for being deported from the U.S. by the Trump administration…”

It is harder and harder for my anarchist mind to empathize with people who regard political authority as legitimate and not a crime https://t.co/m52ZFChYQn

— Michael Malice (@michaelmalice) December 16, 2021

Project Veritas reveals ANOTHER pedophilia scandal involving a CNN producer

Pelosi Ignores the Dumpster Fire, Claims Biden is ‘Just Perfect’

There are a lot of doozies this morning. Shifty Schiff clocks in as a close runner up:

House Committee Admits Schiff Doctored Jan. 6 Text From Jim Jordan

Chicago’s Democrat mayor is probably the worst mayor in the country, but San Francisco’s Democrat mayor is giving her a run for the money. Could London Breed’s recent turn to law and order have anything to do with failing public support?

Why Does San Francisco’s Mayor Suddenly Want to Get Tough on Crime?

Democrats can’t convince their own caucus to go along with their policy ideas. So what is their fall back position? Change the rules so they can govern as a minority while holding the majority. They have no shame. They cannot be embarrassed. Say anything, do anything, to get what you want. Children.

Democrats Are Once Again Desperate to Change Senate Rules, with Sinema Still Not Budging on Filibuster

Petty bureaucrats use regulations for self aggrandizement and enrichment:

California Sheriff Indicted In Concealed Carry Bribery Scandal

Finally, from the colossally stupid file:

Pelosi on San Fran crime wave: Pray tell, where is this attitude of “lawlessness” coming from?

Pelosi can’t figure out what caused the Democrat crime wave in major Democrat run cities across the nation. Huh, go figure!

 

DeSantis Freezes Licenses for Florida Daycare Facilities Paid by the Biden Admin to House Illegal Immigrants

Democrats are more concerned with illegal aliens than with American citizens. The reason is that Democrats want a new and more compliant voting base beholden to them for all the special treatment and free stuff they doled out at taxpayer expense.

Elizabeth Warren Recommends Destroying the Supreme Court

House Dems Reject GOP Plan To Replenish Oil Reserves Biden Drained

CNN’s Don Lemon Rails Against Misinformation About Covid – By Omitting Key Part of Trump Quote

Crime fear grips US, 68% say it’s getting worse

“…Nearly 9 in 10 voters are worried about the crime surge across the nation, and almost 70% fear that there is no end in sight.

In the latest problem facing Democrats and President Joe Biden, 89% of likely voters told Rasmussen Reports that they are concerned about the crime wave. That is 10 points higher than in July.

Headlines have highlighted random shootings, retail smash-and-grabs, and brief jail stays for violent criminals. Meanwhile, some Democrats have pushed plans to defund police departments.

Rasmussen said that a sky-high 64% of voters are “very concerned” about crime…”

Vermont, the most highly vaxxed state (87% with ≥1 dose), reports 95 deaths among 9277 vaxx breakthrough infections for a BTI CFR of 1.02%. Compare this to an overall pandemic CFR of 0.81%, an Overall CFR for 2021 (the vaccine period) of 0.57% or an Unvaxxed 2021 CFR of 0.45%. pic.twitter.com/DgYXGtvbbi

— Don Wolt (@tlowdon) December 12, 2021

Cornell and Princeton shut down campus… With 98% Vaccination rate

J&J Shot Loses Antibody Protection Against Omicron in Study

“…Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine produced virtually no antibody protection against the omicron coronavirus variant in a laboratory experiment, underlining the new strain’s ability to get around one pillar of the body’s defenses. The vaccine appears to provide some defense against omicron, perhaps via other means such as stimulation of immune cells, according to Penny Moore, a South African virologist…”

Can an Ex-President Claim Privilege for Communications While He Was President?

Alan M. Dershowitz:

“…The Constitution provides no clear answer to whether a former president can claim executive privilege over communications that occurred while he was president. Both policy and analogy to other privileges would suggest an affirmative answer. A former spouse, a lawyer’s former client, and a penitent’s former priest can claim privilege — and so could a former member of Congress and a former judge. The relevant issue is whether the communication was privileged at the time it was made. If so, it should be an enduring privilege that encourages confidential communications during their incumbency.

The lawyer for the January 6th Congressional Committee, Douglas Letter, however, has argued that former President Donald J. Trump can no longer claim executive privilege, including over communications with his former chief of staff when they were both in office. According to The New York Times, this is what he said: “The Constitution does draw a clear line between a president and an ex-president. An ex-president is somebody who rejoins the great unwashed” — by which he apparently means you and me, who never had any executive privilege.

Where in the Constitution he or the committee find the “clear line” that supports his cramped interpretation of privilege is unclear. The issue is an open one that will likely be decided by the Supreme Court. I doubt that justices who are now retired or intend someday to retire — and join the “unwashed” — would be thrilled if Congress were to subpoena their former law clerks to disclose their confidential discussions about decisions they wrote while they were still among the washed.

In the absence of a definitive judicial decision to the contrary, former chief of staff Mark Meadows would seem to be required to accept former President Trump’s claim of executive privilege. Were he now to divulge communications that the courts ultimately held were privileged, the damage would be irremediable. The cat could not be returned to the constitutional bag. On the other hand, if he does not now disclose and the courts ruled that he must, the only harm would be some delay. The balance of harms clearly favors non-disclosure at this time.

That is precisely why it is so outrageous for the committee now to be seeking the criminal indictment of Meadows for refusing to disclose material that may well be constitutionally privileged. They should seek to have the courts rule first on the constitutional issue, and if Meadows then refuses to comply with a judicial order, they can seek criminal penalties. This chronology is especially required because Meadows has said that he would comply with court orders.

Seeking a court order first is also required by the constitutionally mandated separation of powers. Congress cannot simply compel the executive to bow to its will when there is a conflict between the two elected branches, the third branch — the judiciary — decide who is correct under the constitution.

Finally, criminal indictments should never be used to determine what the law is. It should only be used against individuals who know that they are violating existing law that is already clear.

The Justice Department should therefore refuse any congressional demand to indict Meadows. If the Justice Department improperly secures an indictment from a grand jury — which they can easily do because, as one judge put it, grand juries would “indict a ham sandwich” if asked to do so — the courts should immediately dismiss it and demand that the Justice Department first get a judicial ruling on the constitutional issue.

The precedent that would be established by allowing an indictment of a former chief of staff to the president for the “crime” of seeking a judicial ruling before irretrievably disclosing information that may well be constitutionally privileged would do great harm to our constitutional structure. Its victims would not only be the president and its former incumbent, but all of us “unwashed” who depend on the courts to guarantee our constitutional rights…”

Florida will not tolerate Cultural Marxism. Critical Race Theory is prohibited by ⁦@GovRonDeSantis⁩.

We stand with our Governor!

CC: ⁦@ChristinaPushaw⁩ pic.twitter.com/MBpmTxj5q0

— Michael Mella 🐊 (@pico87mn) December 15, 2021