Fake meat is failing because it’s gross and unhealthy
The bug eaters maybe.

Images | Commentary | Digital Scrapbook
The bug eaters maybe.
These people are Democrats.
Vote for Democrats and this is what you get.
Democrats.
“…One of the more brutal legal self-owns you’ll see took place in yesterday’s hearing in the Missouri v. Biden Internet censorship case, in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans. For more about the hearing generally, click here, but one moment stood out.
Administration lawyer Daniel Bentele Hahs Tenny was under fire all day from judges who appeared unconvinced — or at least in a mood to debate the point — that statements from White House officials about content like, “[I’m] wondering if we can get moving on the process of having it removed ASAP” do not constitute coercion. At one point Tenny was among other things saying the state couldn’t be coercing social media companies if, for instance, the FBI only succeeded in getting material taken down 50% of the time. “The idea that social media companies had to bend to the FBI’s will, when half the time they didn’t, just doesn’t support those theories.”
This inspired the following exchange between Tenny and Judge Don Willett:
WILLETT: Does coercion necessarily entail a threat, either overt or covert? Isn’t a directive itself enough to constitute unconstitutional coercion, absent an “or else” consequence?
TENNY: I guess I’m not sure what a directive means without a threat like—
WILLETT: “Do this, why haven’t you done this? Get this done. F-bomb do this.”
Willet was referring to a series of emails that included a July 15, 2021 communication from White House official Rob Flaherty reading, “Are you guys fucking serious? I want an answer on what happened here and I want it today”:

Tenny tried to defuse Willett’s question quickly. “I mean, so the, the f-bomb thing, to be clear, is not about content moderation at all… No, I don’t think that’s coercion.”
Judge Jennifer Elrod frowned. “It wasn’t about taking something down?”
“No,” said Tenny. “It was about the president’s Instagram account and something that, um, happened to it.”
Elrod kept frowning. Tenny was fortunate no one pressed him about what exactly “happened” to Joe Biden’s Instagram account. It was about censorship — of Joe Biden, whose administration indirectly asked for the treatment!…”
WATCH: CNN reporter visibly stunned into silence after Iowa Trump supporters take turns shooting down CNN, Biden Regime Psy-Ops to his FACE🤣
"A few days here makes clear Trump's grip is very strong." pic.twitter.com/D2UspRNTws
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) August 10, 2023
These normal people don’t trust him, his channel, or the bullshit force fed the American people 24/7 by garbage media.
CNN Gets a Shock When They Venture out of Their Bubble and Talk to the American People
“…Reagan’s optimism, replaced by Trump’s grievances.” One guy says we have to find a way to take care of ourselves. King’s reaction? “Reagan’s disdain of big government replaced by Trump’s distrust of just about everything.” How dare they think that the prosecutions of Trump are politically motivated just because they’ve seen how everything has rolled out since the Russia collusion hoax? For shame, you silly cultists! The capper that shows how delusional these folks are? Not one hand goes up when he asks if they “support Ukraine in the fight against Putin.”…
…Listening to Republican voters who are skeptical of support for Ukraine is “like watching the open of an old Tucker Carlson show,” King said.
He said some on the left want to call them “deplorable” — but “there are millions of them!”
“They’re good people…They go to Church! But they believe things that would break our fact-check machine,” King despaired. “And they don’t trust us! They think we’re part of the problem!”…”
Fact: the climate disaster death rate has *declined* by 98% over the last century, even as carbon emissions have risen. The average person is 50X less likely to die of a climate-related cause than in 1920. Why? Fossil fuels. An inconvenient truth for the climate cult. pic.twitter.com/nJJRDmwIlF
— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) August 7, 2023
Woke, stupid, and absurd is no way to run a business.
Kari Lake mocks Regime Media to their faces while milking a cow:
"You know there are only two genders, right? The New York Times should try to milk a cow and then try and milk a bull and see how that goes."
pic.twitter.com/GdAPFH4yJy— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) August 11, 2023
“…California Department of Education sent him a letter claiming that because he works with taxpayer-funded data from the agency, he could not criticize the state in court…”
Our country is divided in many ways, but one of the most difficult places to heal that divide can be in our own family. Sometimes, the only thing a family member can hear is, "I love you." pic.twitter.com/8qhSM40v6L
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) August 10, 2023
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1689863238907727872
Two editors from The NY Times were fired for running an op-Ed by Tom Cotton, which argued to use the military to stop the 2020 riots.
Today a defund the police, DCcouncil member calls for the national guard to put down crime.
— Cernovich (@Cernovich) August 9, 2023
Related:
Eric Adams: “If we don’t get the support we need, New Yorkers could be left with a $12 billion bill.”
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) August 10, 2023
From : Defiant L’s
“…The number of scientific papers retracted annually rose from just 40 in 2000 to almost 5,500 in 2022, representing a whopping 13,650% change over the past 22 years, with researchers estimating an astonishing 100,000 would have to be withdrawn every year with more thorough vetting.
Delivering a blow to the “trust the science” cheerleaders, Retraction Watch’s co-founders Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus detail the alarming issues with modern science for the left-wing Guardian newspaper.
The surge in bogus papers is driven in part by the fact that scientists are often “required… to publish papers in order to earn and keep jobs or to be promoted,” which leads to some turning to so-called “paper mills” that “sell everything from authorships to entire manuscripts to researchers who need to publish lest they perish.”
Only around a fifth of retractions are a result of “honest error,” Oransky and Marcus note, highlighting serious misconduct cases such as that of Joachim Boldt, a German anesthesiologist whose falsified data on an ineffective blood substitute was once widely cited and led to many people being harmed.
A related issue is the so-called replication crisis. It has become increasingly apparent that the results found in many scientific papers – possibly a majority of them – cannot be reproduced by other researchers. In 2015, for example, efforts to reproduce psychology studies published in supposedly high-quality journals failed 61 out of 100 times, with similar results in 2018.
The issue is also present in the hard sciences, with efforts by the University of Virginia to reproduce five “landmark” cancer studies failing in one case and producing inconclusive results in two others – hinting that “the science” may be mostly wrong across the board…”
Listen to Feynman on pseudoscience:
Why do the hard work of actually figuring out things when pseudoscience has become socially acceptable pic.twitter.com/QKf5wdQdK2
— There's no "I" in craftmanship (@6851cf3c) December 25, 2021
“…The Environmental Protection Agency is proposing a new rule limiting CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired (coal and natural gas) power plants. As you might expect, given the ideological bent of EPA, the rule is a Trojan horse, the real purpose of which is to induce the nation’s coal plants and some natural gas power generation to shut down under the increasing weight of federal regulations.
Center of the American Experiment is sounding the alarm on EPA’s rule. Our energy team was hired by the State of North Dakota to model the EPA proposal to determine whether it could supply reliable electricity to the 15 states on the MISO (Midcontinent Independent System Operator) grid. Our team found that the grid implied by the EPA rule, heavily dependent on sporadic wind and solar power, would result in devastating blackouts. They further calculated that if the grid were to be made mostly (but not entirely) immune to blackouts, while still complying with the EPA rule, another $246 billion would have to be spent within the MISO system alone…
…EPA’s power plant regulations will devastate ordinary people–those who rely on electricity and want affordable transportation–while enriching a handful of well-connected industries that have curried the favor of the current administration…”
“…Maids clean up messes around the house, but in Canada, MAID cleans up after that country’s mess of a health care system. Just ask 37-year-old Vancouver resident Kathrin Mentler, who was offered the chance to kill herself because there weren’t any psychiatrists available to treat her chronic depression.
There are slippery slopes and then there are elevator shafts going straight down to immediate doom — and that seems to be exactly where Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) is leading increasing numbers of reasonably healthy Canadians…
…Stage Four lung cancer? MAID. Permanently disabled and unable to care for yourself? MAID. Chronic pain? MAID. Down in the dumps? MAID. Are you one of those icky poor people? MAID…”
This is directly attributable to Democrat policy preferences.
What could go wrong?