House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan lays out sweeping agenda for judicial reform

Hochul Blasts ‘Renegade’ New York Counties Cooperating With ICE

Democrats will destroy the judiciary and public trust in the institution.

More:

American tax dollars are paying for this crank and NPR. DOGE both.

A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming Hypothesis (pdf download)

Abstract:

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) attributes observed climate variability primarily to anthropogenic CO₂ emissions, asserting that these emissions have driven approximately 1 Wm⁻² of net radiative forcing since 1750, resulting in a global temperature rise of 0.8- 1.1°C. This conclusion relies heavily on adjusted datasets and outputs from global climate models (GCMs) within the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) framework. However, this study conducts a rigorous evaluation of these assertions by juxtaposing them against unadjusted observational data and synthesizing findings from recent peer-reviewed literature. Our analysis reveals that human CO₂ emissions, constituting a mere 4% of the annual carbon cycle, are dwarfed by natural fluxes, with isotopic signatures and residence time data indicating negligible long-term atmospheric retention. Moreover, individual CMIP3 (2005-2006), CMIP5 (2010-2014), andCMIP6 (2013-2016) model runs consistently fail to replicate observed temperature trajectories and sea ice extent trends, exhibiting correlations (R²) near zero when compared to unadjusted records. A critical flaw emerges in the IPCC’s reliance on a single, low-variability Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction, despite the existence of 27 viable alternatives, where higher-variability options align closely with observed warming—itself exaggerated by data adjustments. We conclude that the anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis lacks empirical substantiation, overshadowed by natural drivers such as temperature feedbacks and solar variability, necessitating a fundamental reevaluation of current climate paradigms.

Jasmine Crockett Now Leads the Dems’ Angry, Pathetic Mob

Trump’s appeals are piling up for the Supreme Court

Related:

Trump Fights Lefty Judges as Cowardly SCOTUS Dithers

The federal judiciary is out of control with activist Democrat judges:

West-Coast Judges Say Trump Admin Must Take In Refugees and Pay for Their Housing

“…A trio of federal judges in California declared on Tuesday that President Donald Trump must welcome roughly 40,000 refugees approved by President Joe Biden’s deputies…”

Where Democrats are, in and out of judiciary:

CA Dem Defends Health Insurance for Illegals — Even When State Can’t Afford It

Absolutely preposterous.

The longer the Chief Justice allows this to continue, the worse it will be for public trust in our judicial system.

Counterintelligence and Canary Traps