FBI: Gilroy shooter not a white supremacist, another MSM #FAIL

STEPHEN KRUISER:

“…El Chucko expressed his concerns about President Trump’s “credibility” as a “moral leader” and “blah blah blah.” It means that he can’t do all of the healing and unifying that the people who keep telling him they hate him demand.

As we saw yesterday with Ana Navarro, it’s another case of there being virtually nothing that President Trump can do that will please these idiots. Thankfully, he knows that and doesn’t try.

He does, however, still have to be the president of the United States.

He did that yesterday in Dayton, Ohio. And he did it despite the fact that the city’s mayor was cheerleading protesters ahead of his visit.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I am beginning to doubt that these lefties really want peace and love.

It is obvious that the Democrats and their various offshoots truly believe the path to victory next year and beyond involves trying to destroy this president. They no doubt also believe that by repeatedly lying about him they’ll wear down and push away some, many, or most of his supporters.

Turns out that strategy may be having the opposite effect, as the president’s support is still ticking upward, even after some of the most egregiously biased and awful media coverage he’s had to endure. The Dems and their media mouthpieces are minting new Trump fans every day now, a fact of which they remain blissfully unaware…”

Original

Byron York:

“…The manifesto written by accused El Paso mass killer Patrick Crusius is the basis for the argument that the shootings were inspired by President Trump. Media commentators, Democratic presidential candidates, and all types of Trump critics have made that case in the days since the murders…

…So what did Crusius actually write?…

…First, to be clear: The manifesto is insane. Part of it discussed commonly debated issues such as the environment and the economy in ways that are well within the boundaries of political conversation going on today — indeed, that might have come out of the New York Times or many other outlets. Other parts of it mixed in theories on immigration from far right circles in Europe and the U.S. Then it threw in beliefs on “race-mixing” straight from the fever swamps. And then it concluded that the solution is to murder Hispanic immigrants, going on to debate whether an AK-47 or an AR-15 would best do the job. By that point, Crusius had veered far from both reality and basic humanity.

But the question is, was he inspired by President Trump? It is hard to make that case looking at the manifesto in its entirety.

Crusius worried about many things, if the manifesto is any indication. He certainly worried about immigration, but also about automation. About job losses. About a universal basic income. Oil drilling. Urban sprawl. Watersheds. Plastic waste. Paper waste. A blue Texas. College debt. Recycling. Healthcare. Sustainability. And more. Large portions of the manifesto simply could not be more un-Trumpian…

Original

Woman says meth found hidden inside vagina is not hers

Chris Buskirk:

“…Democrats have complained about police brutality for years. The police, they assure us, are out of control. And, the story goes, they have it in for anyone whose skin is not lily white. You can’t trust the racist cops, they tell us. Remember Ferguson, Missouri, Eric Garner, Philando Castile, Tamir Rice, and others.

But these same Democrats also tell us that the police are the only ones who should have guns, which is to say that the police we’re not supposed to trust, who are guilty—in their view—of unspeakable crimes against Americans, should be given a monopoly on physical force and that private citizens should be deprived of their most effective means of defending themselves. That’s a headscratcher, but I’ll come back to that later.

For now, I want to focus on faithless Republicans who are being stampeded by an activist-driven, media-empowered hysteria into passing ill-advised gun control legislation that is bad on its surface and is rife for abuse. Not only are congressional Republicans making noise about gun control laws that Obama could never get passed but the New York Times reported that President Trump is looking for ways to enact gun control through executive action.

Allow me to propose a radical thought: Rushing important legislation that affects people’s most fundamental rights based on what’s trending on Twitter is not the best way to run a serious country…”

Original

Click over to read samples of the crazy

Bonchie:

“…It started off with three mass shootings within a 24 hour period, one in El Paso, one in Dayton, and one in Chicago. Because the latter two didn’t fit the narrative, they were essentially memory-holed right away. I don’t think the shooting in Chicago even made national news for the most part.

While acts of evil are distressing enough, it was the response to those shootings which has brought such a unique dread to the public sphere. Bad things have happened throughout our history, but the venom with which one side is attacking the other over things they had nothing to do with has reached a new level in the modern era. It really does feel like we are coming apart at the seams, with near majorities of the country being accused of “white supremacy” by some major figures simply for supporting a politician.

Driving the division, broad brushing, and hatred this week had been the liberal media. Whether it’s newspapers amplifying the disgusting rhetoric of people like Beto O’Rourke and Elizabeth Warren or the constant stream of divisive, racially tinged editorials that are being pushed out, there’s no question of their role. The cable news beat has been even worse, with one MSNBC host actually saying that Donald Trump wants there to be mass shootings while another threatened business owners as complicit in white supremacy who donate to the GOP.

I never thought I’d say this during the Trump era because things are also so crazy, but this week was different. A line was crossed by the media and there’s no going back…”

Original

JEFF GOLDSTEIN:

“…Three years ago, writing in the Federalist, I noted how the Left’s embrace — and political deployment — of identity politics had given rise to, and become a perverse justification for (in its own hive mind), white supremacy, a blunt rejection of the collective call by the Left and academia to demonize whiteness.

I pored over and unpacked the “alt-right manifesto” of an influential “thought leader” of the movement and found what was easily recognizable: a progressive strain placing it on par with La Raza, BLM, CAIR, and Occupy (now Antifa). It’s essentially Farrakhanism in a bedsheet.

The El Paso shooter, if we believe his manifesto, was, for all intents and purposes, a confused National Socialist. He trafficked in identity and grievance politics while supporting much of the Green New Deal. He railed against capitalism and jobs lost to automation. He’s a leftist — as were the Nazis — who found himself part of an unprotected class; the Dayton shooter supported, in addition to Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, Antifa, which may have actually provided him gun tips in advance of his eventual spree killing. He, too, was a leftist.

This is why conservatives should deplore all identity and grievance politics, regardless of the color they take. Intersectionality, however, is the Left’s stock and trade, from the academy to the media to Hollywood. Until that is marginalized, you won’t kill white supremacy, despite pleadings by the editors at National Review.

Here’s why: Many of the motivations of the white supremacist movement, which Vox Day couched as “alt-right” in his alt-right “manifesto,” were predictable and — again, however perversely — understandable: in a political and cultural ethos wherein white straight Christian males have become one of the last “identity groups” eligible for collective hostility and scapegoating, there was bound to be defensive pushback. In my piece, I commiserated with some of the alt-right’s concerns while rejecting its underlying philosophy; I counseled the rejection of all identity politics and intersectionality, suggesting instead a return to founding principles: constitutionalism, federalism, republicanism, the rule of law, assimilation, and — most crucially — individualism, individual rights, and autonomy…”

Original

JOHN HINDERAKER:

“…The Democratic Party has descended into a maelstrom of hate. I’ve been around for a while, and I have never seen anything like it. Whenever you think they can’t sink lower, they do. Here are two news items, just from today.

A gang of Democrats besieged Mitch McConnell’s house and called for him to be murdered:

Far-left demonstrators appeared at Mitch McConnell’s home in Louisville on Monday night and protested the 77-year-old who is recovering from a broken shoulder after he fell.

A short clip of the protesters was posted to Twitter by Ben Goldey, a life-long Kentuckian.

In the video, one person says they hope someone uses a “voodoo doll” on McConnell. Another person in the video says they hope somebody “just stab the mother f***er in the heart, please.”

Here is the video:

A woman is on Facebook Live, outside of Senator McConnell’s home in Louisville, saying she hopes someone “just stabs the mother f*cker in the heart, please.” #KYSen pic.twitter.com/sHaPWqn32J

— Ben Goldey (@BenGoldey) August 6, 2019

Next, Joaquin Castro, the brother and campaign manager of presidential candidate Julian Castro, and himself a Texas representative, tweeted a list of San Antonio residents who have contributed to President Trump’s campaign.

Castro’s claim about a “campaign of hate that labels Hispanic immigrants as ‘invaders’” is of course a lie. But what possible motive can he have for publishing this list to his Twitter followers other than to encourage harassment of, and perhaps violence against, Trump supporters? No doubt he would be happy if violent Democrats gathered on these people’s lawns, as Democrats did at Mitch McConnell’s house in Kentucky.

I don’t think it is possible for a party as distorted by rage and hate as today’s Democratic Party to command the support of a majority of Americans. I guess we will find out soon enough whether that optimistic assessment is correct…”

Original

Dennis Prager:

“…The president of the United States, Donald Trump, never said there were “fine” Nazis or Ku Klux Klansmen.

This is one of the two great lies of our time — the other being that all Trump supporters are racists — and perhaps in all of American history. I cannot think of a lie of such significance that was held as truth by so many Americans, by every leading politician of one of the two major political parties and disseminated by virtually the entire media.

The major news media need to understand these are important reasons that half of America considers them frauds. And we get no pleasure from this fact. The reason we don’t recoil when the president labels the mainstream media “fake news” is that we know the charge is true. Has one major media news outlet yet apologized to the American people for preoccupying them for nearly two years with the lie of “Trump collusion” with Russia? Has one Democrat? Of course not. Because with regard to the Trump-Russia collusion issue, the news media were never driven by a pursuit of truth; they were driven by a pursuit of Trump…”

Original

Dayton Shooter’s Now-Suspended Twitter Appears To Have Had Pro-Antifa, Pro-Gun Control Comments

SHELBY TALCOTT:

“…The shooter identified in Sunday’s Dayton, Ohio, attack appears to have had a now-suspended Twitter account filled with far-left rhetoric and comments about guns.

Connor Betts, 24, opened fire in downtown Dayton early Sunday morning. He killed nine people, including his sister, and injured 27 others. This attack came 14 hours after 21-year-old Patrick Crusius allegedly murdered 22 peopleand injured over two dozen others in an El Paso, Texas, shopping area Saturday.

The Twitter account, called “@iamthespookster,” included retweets about attacks against fascists, comments about guns and support for Satan, Heavy first reported.

Photographs from the Twitter account look similar to those circulating identifying Betts. One picture tweeted out is of a new tattoo, which can be partially seen from a photo used in articles about the shooting. He had references about Dayton and apparent family members had commented on some of his tweets…”

Original

Patently Obvious!

Julie Kelly:

“…The anti-Trump forces, now stripped of their Russian collusion ammunition, have invented another imaginary threat they hope to weaponize against the president: The public menace posed by “white supremacist” terrorism.

Much like the collusion conspiracy theory—which relied on random incidents, fictional villains, unconvincing evidence, and the Bad Orange Man in the White House—there is little substance to this purported danger.

Unironically, the whole ruse is being pushed by the same people who foisted the Russian collusion hoax on the American people for three years in the hopes of prompting President Trump’s impeachment and removal. The political agenda behind this manufactured white supremacy crisis is equally sinister because its specific purpose is to influence and undermine the 2020 elections.

The “white supremacy” canard is intended to further demonize Trump; falsely defame his supporters as white supremacists; and pressure nervous voters into defeating Trump and Republican candidates next year. The strategy is as cynical as it is pernicious…”

Original

Liz Sheld:

“…Were you ready for the massacre aftermath and analysis coming from the media/Democrats/”conservatives” funded by the left? A cornucopia of think-pieces, editorializing-masquerading-as-news, finger-wagging and general peacock-strutting for a runway of virtue on social media and cable “news.”

We have solutions! Sadly, all these solutions, that “do something,” all involve infringement on your rights and have nothing to effectively address gun violence. First up, let’s ban assault weapons.  Do you know what happened during the 10-year life of the Clinton assault weapons ban? Columbine. Did we stop/reduce gun violence? Nope. Also complicating this plan is that there is no such thing as an “assault weapon.” What exactly makes something an “assault weapon” as opposed to non-assault rifle? (a barrel shroud?!?) Can anyone tell me what special features make an “assault weapon” more deadly than a garden variety rifle? I can’t find an answer to that from the zealous crowd that wants to stop you from owning them.

Another “solution” being tossed around is the familiar ban of the high capacity magazine. The main problem with all this talk about reforming gun policy is that most of the people pontificating about it do not know anything about firearms. They don’t own them and they’ve never used them. Gun grabbers are just parroting things that are accepted as gun control wisdom from their well-funded leftists overlords. How long does it take to switch out your mag? Like 2 seconds? If you are in a room or a store or a bar or a restaurant with unarmed people, the necessity of dropping your mag and slipping in another is not a deterrent. And of course your potential victims would be disarmed because homicidal maniacs choose gun-free zones to make their stands. It’s an inconvenience besides, who follows the gun laws? Not the criminal!

Not out of character for the left and one of their favorite tools to use in service of their tyranny: deplatforming. Time to shut down some websites in the name of public safety. 8chan is already a victim of this plan and others will soon follow. What constitutes dangerous speech? No worries, we can let the left decide what that is, but we should be confident in their abilities they have been well-displayed through their governance of YouTube, Twitter and Facebook. You had better keep your thoughts and words in check or else you will punished by the good Samaritans who want to stop gun violence. It’s for a good cause.

We mustn’t forget the ubiquitous “universal background check” solution. This worn out mantra involves closing the pretend “gun show loophole” but really is about banning private sales of firearms. Many states have already done this. But does it work? The two maniacs who slaughtered people last weekend had no problem buying their guns after a background check. Nor did the Gilroy shooter, so its not clear how this measure would have stopped anything. How can you stop someone before they commit a crime? Constitutionally you can’t but what’s a little constitution to get in the way of stopping gun violence, right? Right??

Are you fan of due process? Too bad. The Red Flag Law solution will give some kind of power to the government to take your firearms based on….I guess whatever they decide makes you dangerous. A confidence inspiring gesture indeed, especially because we’ve seen how well our political adversaries tolerate dissent from their orthodoxy. Can you imagine all the punitive reporting the to Ministry of Red Flags controlled by the Comey FBI? Turn over your guns or else, I mean what are you, in favor of gun violence or something? What do you do if someone hasn’t purchased firearms yet? Is there a process to decide whether you should have your guns removed or do the jackboots pull a Manafort and just kick in your door and take them? Sounds terrific…”

Original