Images | Commentary | Digital Scrapbook
https://twitter.com/TheFigen/status/1235556942002581506
This is amazing.
Biden 2020: That amazing tax cut you got? Oh, you're doing better? Well not under my administration!pic.twitter.com/itP6DKiTfA
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) March 2, 2020
“We’re coming in with a strong economic growth base across the board,” NEC Director Larry Kudlow says following the blowout February jobs report. He adds that “economic problems” due to the coronavirus will “be temporary and short-lived.” https://t.co/cfMxI1YTEO pic.twitter.com/kdq35IsQlZ
— CNBC (@CNBC) March 6, 2020
Related:
Kudlow: Buy on the dip, on COVID-19 "this is contained", "relatively contained." pic.twitter.com/iF4Nheem4i
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) March 6, 2020
I wasn’t sure how he would do in this type of setting, but I thought he did very well.
In this 20 second clip @JoeBiden lies to voters about:
– the number of degrees he has
– his grades in law school
– his scholarships to law school
– finishing place in law school
– honors he received in school
– his hair plugsScumbag behavior runs in the Biden family: pic.twitter.com/3aPiqd3IQv
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) March 5, 2020
JOHN O. MCGINNIS:
“…The nation’s legal culture ultimately determines how the Constitution is interpreted. When originalism had fallen into desuetude, the Warren Court decided cases without substantial, if any, consideration of very plausible originalist positions. It did not even deign to respond to overwhelmingly powerful originalist arguments, such as those made by Justice John Marshall Harlan in dissent in Reynolds v. Sims. That kind of performance is no longer conceivable because originalism has established an important foothold in the legal culture.
This new culture is not only a consequence of having originalist judges but also of having originalist scholars analyzing the meaning of constitutional clauses. There is a necessary division of labor between judges and scholars. Judges cannot generally be expected to do original research. They must rely on the work of experts, transmitted to them through the adversary system. We have seen this collaboration transform the law before: Justices translated the free market antitrust theories of scholars like Robert Bork and Richard Posner into a newly coherent doctrine.
Moreover, one of the obstacles to the growth of originalism has been the claim that much of the Constitution is indeterminate—that is, that its key provisions, like the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause, do not a have a meaning sufficiently clear to generate legal decisions. But as the culture of originalism gains hold, scholars are showing that the inability to define the meaning of these clauses is not due to their indeterminacy but our ignorance of their legal meaning. Modern originalism recovers much knowledge that was lost during its years of abandonment…”
Whoopi Goldberg accidentally suggests Jill Biden, who has a doctorate in education, be appointed surgeon general if Joe wins in 2020, calling her a “hell of a doctor” https://t.co/IxwDoWWfMH pic.twitter.com/8AhvPas2Nx
— The Hill (@thehill) March 5, 2020
You could not pay me to watch that show
Stephen Kruiser:
“…We’re going to lead off today with a topic that is sadly evergreen and that needs to be written and talked about until it no longer is. Higher education in America is a pathetic, roiling cesspool of leftist lunacy that works feverishly to mint new socialists/communists/whatever every day right under our noses…”
Related:
Less than 2 percent of Harvard faculty are conservative, survey finds.
If journalists keep referring to Biden's cognition failures as "gaffes" they are deceiving the public. His brain is deteriorating and it's obvious to anyone paying attention. Not surprising for a 77-year-old man, and not a comfortable subject. But it's the truth: stop obfuscating
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) March 4, 2020
I agree with this. Biden is not looking super good. He seems to have deteriorated in just the last few months.