“Shredding The Fabric Of Our Democracy”: Biden Aide Signals Push For Greater Censorship On The Internet

Guess who they plan to censor.

A Conspiracy Collapses In The Court: Justices Appear To Confirm A Majority In Favor Of Preserving The ACA

Democrats and the MSM prove themselves unable to tell the truth, again, and again.

Tens of Thousands of Pennsylvania Ballots Returned Earlier Than Sent Date: Researcher

Longer version

Media can rant, scream, hide facts, ignore logic, ignore history, bully weak-minded peers, etc. They have ZERO credibility with Americans who intuitively understand error-riddled mail-in balloting schemes with little or no oversight make for a dangerously untrustworthy system.

— Mollie (@MZHemingway) November 10, 2020

Yep, he said that. pic.twitter.com/rw4rDmXO98

— The Recount (@therecount) November 10, 2020

U.S. Rejected Ukraine Election Results Over Absentee Ballots, Opponent Observer Restrictions, And Wild Turnout Numbers

Do you hear that dog that isn't barking? It's the top statistical experts on the left who are looking at election rigging allegations and coming to a slow boil in their own flop sweat.

— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) November 10, 2020

MSNBC contributor Jon Meacham didn’t disclose he reportedly helped write Biden’s presidential acceptance speech when commenting on it

https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1325841367944212480

2000-Gore refuses to concede & spends over a month in court challenges: HERO!

2018-Abrams refuses to concede for almost two weeks & challenges legitimacy of vote: HERO!

2020-Trump refuses to concede until allegations of voter fraud are resolved: UNDERMINING DEMOCRACY

— Razor (@hale_razor) November 6, 2020

“Bring Out Your Dead”: The Trump Campaign Faces Calls For Evidence To Support Allegations of Voter Fraud

“…I have expressed skepticism over the sweeping claims of fraud or that the current margins could be overcome with anything other than systemic flaws in the authentication of ballots. However, the demand for clear evidence of systemic violations after only a couple days of the tabulation stage is bizarre. We would not necessarily have such evidence, which is largely held by election officials. As expected, we have a series of localized affidavits and allegations of intentional fraud. Yet, network analysts were dismissing any and all allegations within the first 24 hours, as tabulations were continuing. It is like saying that a patient has a low white blood cell level but insisting on stopping testing if you cannot conclusively say that there is cancer. These initial allegations may or may not be indicative of a more systemic problem. There is no reason to presume fraud but also no reason to demand concessions before we look at these allegations, particularly with the addition of sworn statements and at least one computer problem resulting in loss of thousands of Trump votes in Michigan. Half of this country voted for Trump and it is not much for them to ask for a review of the challenges — a right that the Democrats would be demanding if the positions in this close election were reversed. Moreover, those voters can be understandably skeptical to hear these instant dismissals from networks, which previously predicted a sweeping victory for Biden and the Democrats. Even if, as expected, these allegations are rejected, it is important for this country to have a full and open consideration of these claims and the underlying evidence…”

Joe Biden’s Non-Mandate

“…Mr. Biden will win the popular vote, and he may eke out a narrow win in the Electoral College. In essence he’ll have reversed Mr. Trump’s victory in 2016 with hair’s-breadth advantages in Wisconsin and Michigan, and perhaps Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona. None of them will be by large margins. He will have vanquished an incumbent President, which is no easy task.

But look down the ballot, or across the country, and Mr. Biden’s potential victory looks remarkably limited and personal. Most new Presidents enter office having swept allies into Congress and statehouses as the public embraces his agenda and vision for America. Certainly this was true of Barack Obama in 2008 and to a lesser extent Mr. Trump in 2016. Mr. Biden had no such coattails.

Democrats lost seats in the House, giving up some of the suburban gains they made in 2018 while continuing to struggle in rural areas. The full results won’t be in for weeks, but Speaker Nancy Pelosi may find her majority cut in half or more to the smallest in 20 years.

Senate control may be determined by a Jan. 5 runoff for two seats in Georgia. But the GOP already looks to have won 50 seats to 48 for Democrats, who had expected to ride public dislike for Mr. Trump into the majority. A GOP Senate may compromise with Mr. Biden around centrist ideas, but the aggressive House agenda of the last two years would die again.

This result is all the more remarkable given that Democrats had nearly all of the media, Silicon Valley billionaires, and all of the leading cultural figures and institutions helping them. Even the Chamber of Commerce paid protection money. Democrats raised unheard of sums close to $100 million for some Senate races, outspending Republicans by two or three to one. They still could oust only two incumbents and lost one of their own.

The lack of coattails was also evident in the states, where Democrats spent heavily to flip legislatures, but failed…”

Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question

“…From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature…”