Judge Emmet Sullivan Releases Whiney, Politicized 43 Page Opinion
Democrats and the left seem to have infiltrated and captured many of our national institutions and are in the process of destroying them.


Images | Commentary | Digital Scrapbook
Democrats and the left seem to have infiltrated and captured many of our national institutions and are in the process of destroying them.

https://twitter.com/ali/status/1336442519677251587
“…Yesterday the State of Texas filed pleadings in the U.S. Supreme Court alleging that the electoral processes followed by Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin in this year’s election were unconstitutional and the results in those states should be negated. Because this is a lawsuit between states, the Supreme Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction. Texas’s pleadings are embedded below.
The Texas motion and supporting brief are well-drafted and make a plausible case–importantly, one that, if accepted, does not require extensive fact-finding into alleged voter fraud. Reduced to its essentials, the motion alleges 1) that under the Constitution’s Electors Clause, state legislatures have plenary authority over appointment of each state’s electors; 2) that in each of the defendant states, non-legislative actors (e.g., the Secretary of State) unconstitutionally changed the rules governing this year’s election without legislative approval or ratification; 3) that these changes favored some voters over others, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause; and 4) in each state, the number of ballots that were counted pursuant to unconstitutional changes in election procedures exceeds the margin of Joe Biden’s alleged victory.
So far, so good. What does Texas want the Supreme Court to do?
A. Declare that Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin administered the 2020 presidential election in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
B. Declare that any electoral college votes cast by such presidential electors appointed in Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin are in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and cannot be counted.
C. Enjoin Defendant States’ use of the 2020 election results for the Office of President to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College.
D. Enjoin Defendant States’ use of the 2020 election results for the Office of President to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College and authorize, pursuant to the Court’s remedial authority, the Defendant States to conduct a special election to appoint presidential electors.
E. If any of Defendant States have already appointed presidential electors to the Electoral College using the 2020 election results, direct such States’ legislatures, pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 2 and U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1, cl. 2, to appoint a new set of presidential electors in a manner that does not violate the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment, or to appoint no presidential electors at all.
F. Enjoin the Defendant States from certifying presidential electors or otherwise meeting for purposes of the electoral college pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 5, 3 U.S.C. § 7, or applicable law pending further order of this Court.
Texas argues that there is time for the Court to act:
None of the looming election deadlines are constitutional, and they all are within this Court’s power to enjoin. Indeed, if this Court vacated a State’s appointment of presidential electors, those electors could not vote on December 14, 2020; if the Court vacated their vote after the fact, the House of Representatives could not count those votes on January 6, 2021. Moreover, any remedial action can be complete well before January 6, 2020. Indeed, even the swearing in of the next President on January 20, 2021, will not moot this case because review could outlast even the selection of the next President….
Based on a quick review, Texas’s lawsuit strikes me as plausible from a legal standpoint. It avoids the morass of fact-finding on numerous claims of fraud and irregularity (although there are considerable allegations along these lines in the pleadings) that cannot possibly be carried out by a court in a workable time frame. Does that mean the case will succeed? No. It may very well be subject to legal infirmities that the defendant states will soon point out. And the likelihood that the Supreme Court will seriously entertain the idea of overturning the apparent result of the election is far-fetched.
Still, Texas’s lawsuit represents the most credible and practical challenge to Joe Biden’s tainted victory that I have seen…”
You can’t make it up!
BREAKING: IRS tax filings reveal that Obama's Organizing for Action paid Perkins Coie LLP $302,000 in "legal services" in 2016 as Perkins Coie paid for the anti-Trump Russia dossier and spread its debunked allegations to the Hillary Clinton Campaign, DNC, Washington media and FBI
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) December 7, 2020
“…Over the weekend, a video of Angela Marsden, the owner of the Pineapple Hill Saloon & Grill of Los Angeles, protesting the city shutting down outdoor dining with no scientific basis went viral. The video showed Marsden’s emotional plea for help as she exposed how a similar set of tents and tables were set up in the same parking lot to cater a film production approved by the city.
Only part of Marsden’s comments made it onto NBC’s Sunday Today. But reporter Meagan Fitzgerald deceptively edited out Marsden pointing to the hypocrisy with the tents and tables. Worse yet, NBC covered up the fact that the catering was for NBC’s comedy show, Good Girls…”
Bar owner in Los Angeles CA is livid to see that mayor Garcetti has approved an outdoor dining area for a movie company directly across from her outdoor dining area (which was shut down) pic.twitter.com/jkUP2CWg35
— Jake Coco 🙏🏻💙🇺🇸 (@jakecoco) December 4, 2020
“…A Big Tech-backed ‘fact’ ‘checking’ outfit claimed to debunk explosive evidence for Republicans’ claims of significant election problems in Georgia. It didn’t…”
https://twitter.com/SharylAttkisson/status/1335616923845992450
While Trump had an army of support, Benny says Biden's "win" had to have been a Christmas Miracle. 🎄 @bennyjohnson https://t.co/VlT7z8drtO pic.twitter.com/uLIWaDMMMj
— NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) December 6, 2020

Responses:
Imagine if all of the time spent teaching #CriticalRaceTheory or other woke issues to high school students was instead dedicated to teaching basic construction, auto mechanic or excel skills?
How much more valuable would a high school diploma be?
— Ian Martiszus (@IanFelipeSays) December 6, 2020
teachers unions are a plague upon this country and its education system.
— j̷o̵h̶n̶🟣🏴☠️ (@revjohn22) December 6, 2020
The resistance to reopen schools is rooted in gold-bricking.
— Bono Estente (@BonoEstente) December 6, 2020



https://twitter.com/IPOT1776/status/1335613433908142080
“…A Sacramento Bee headline from late October, “How liberal politics, COVID-19 and a high cost of living are fueling a new California exodus,” could have been written, without the virus reference, a year ago. Or ten years ago. The flight from California kicked off long before this year’s pandemic.
Eight years ago, an Investor’s Business Daily editorial laid out the reasons Californians were moving “To Texas (And Arizona And Nevada),” all of them fueled by progressive public policy. That same year, a Manhattan Institute report detailed “the great ongoing California exodus . . . reversing the storied passages of the Dust Bowl era.” The authors attributed the mass departure to policy decisions making the state a less desirable place to live. Two years earlier, in 2010, New Geography asked: “If California Is Doing So Great, Why Are So Many Leaving?” and noted that the state’s “domestic migration has been negative every year since at least 1990.”
Nor is the California exodus limited to desperate residents. Joe Vranich, a relocation specialist once headquartered in Irvine, California, but now settled in Pennsylvania, has been tracking business departures since 2008. Vranich says that he became “irritated by repeated comments from California politicians, including governor Jerry Brown, that business departures . . . were not a big deal.” As he analyzed the companies, jobs, and capital fleeing the state, he realized the drain was significant. The state’s toxic business environment, Vranich estimates, caused as many as 13,000 “disinvestment events” from 2008 to 2016.
Data-analytics software company Palantir is among the firms to announce more recently that it is leaving California. CNBC characterized its decision to relocate from Palo Alto to Denver as “one of the first signals that a long-anticipated exodus from Silicon Valley is on the horizon.” Hewlett-Packard, a garage-band Silicon Valley original, recently announced that it would move its global headquarters to Texas, seeking “opportunities for cost savings,” while accommodating “team members’ preferences about the future of work.”…”
Related:
My Affidavit – filed in @LLinWood& @SidneyPowell1 lawsuit 2 weeks ago – calculated ~22% vote transfer from @realDonaldTrump to @JoeBiden. Now, evidence from seized Dominion machines PROVES my analysis correct.
Trump voters “4/5ths” a person!
In America, NO #OnePersonOneVote https://t.co/e9jdsJ1R5h pic.twitter.com/oztD8Rq4GB
— Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email (@va_shiva) December 6, 2020
Our new @trafalgar_group 2020 #Georgia #Senate #Runoff #poll conducted 12/1 – 12/3 shows tight races:
Senate Runoff
48.0% @Ossoff,
47.3% @PerdueSenate,
4.7% Und.Senate Runoff (special)
50.2% @KLoeffler,
45.3% @ReverendWarnock,
4.6% Und. See Report: https://t.co/S1YLDI9gsz pic.twitter.com/2UPl7oiuav— Robert C. Cahaly (@RobertCahaly) December 4, 2020
Our @trafalgar_group #GASen #Runoff #Polls also shed some light on Georgia voters opinions of whether the #Presidential elections were compromised enough to change the outcome. All voters 53.2% yes, 37.9% no, 8.9% unsure. GOP voters 74.6% yes, 15.9% no, 9.5% unsure.
— Robert C. Cahaly (@RobertCahaly) December 4, 2020
Please see my statement regarding Southern California being placed under the Governor’s regional stay-at-home order. pic.twitter.com/lgvvHGnasp
— OC Sheriff Don Barnes (@OCSheriffBarnes) December 5, 2020
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1325513362545897472
Related:
To understand 2020, consider that President Elect Biden called for Democrats to unify with the people he calls neo-Nazi supporters and no one asked a follow-up question.
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) December 5, 2020
Hat tip to Ed Driscoll