Biden Administration colludes with social media to censor Americans’ speech. Can you guess which Americans are being censored? Don’t worry, it’s for your own good.

The First Rule of Censorship Club

“The first rule of Fight Club is: you do not talk about Fight Club.”

Something very similar is at work in the operations of Big Tech, acting as a political arms of the Biden administration. Using the pretext of suppressing “misinformation,” Facebook and other platforms are identifying and silencing the administration’s opponents and, even though this is happening in full view of anyone paying attention, you’re not going to know anything about it if you get your news from CNN, MSNBC or one of the broadcast network troika of NBC/ABC/CBS.

In fact, the liberal media are engaged in “fact-checking” that labels reporting about this censorship as (you guessed it) “misinformation.”

Politico reported last week that the Democratic National Committee is going to “work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages.”

Repeat: “text messages.”

The DNC is going to censor your text messages?…

…Why is that “smart” people, like Jen Psaki, believe that they are capable of discerning the difference between facts and “misinformation,” yet they believe the rest of the country is full of people too stupid to tell the difference? Like, “We need to censor Facebook or otherwise your grandmother is going to die from drinking bleach.”

What is at the heart of the White House crusade to suppress “misinformation” about COVID-19 is not an issue of fact, as to the safety and efficacy of vaccines, but rather an issue of power — the Biden administration seeks the authority to control what people are allowed to publish on social media platforms, not just about COVID-19 vaccines, but about anything it might deem to be dangerous in some way. The issue is not about the specific content of any particular message on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc., but instead whether these companies are going to be taking orders from the White House. Saagar Enjeti nailed it:

Democrat thought leaders in Chicago come up with an idea to reduce out-of-control violence. Is there a normal adult in the U.S. besides Democrat politicians and liberal media personalities who thinks it will work?

Good luck with that! Chicago mental health professionals will be dispatched on 911 calls instead of cops following defund the police protests – as gang members now outnumber officers ten to one

Related:

Will the mental health professionals have bullet proof vests? Sidearms? How will they defend themselves?

 

Commentary on the Democrats claims about election integrity from an old political hand, Michael Barone

Joe Biden’s big lie

“…Did you know that black people are not going to be allowed to vote in America anymore? At least in states controlled by Republicans. Sounds a bit unlikely, but that’s a conclusion you might have come to if you took seriously what President Joe Biden was saying in Philadelphia Tuesday.

Biden decried Republicans’ proposed changes in election laws as “the 21st-century Jim Crow assault” that tries “to suppress and subvert the right to vote in fair and free elections, an assault on democracy.”

This is, to be polite, unhinged nonsense.

Biden is old enough to remember what real Jim Crow voter suppression was like. It meant zero black people voting in places such as Mississippi. It meant threats and violence against black people who tried to register to vote. It meant the unfair application of literacy tests and poll taxes.

Requiring voters to present picture ID is nothing like this: Large majorities think it’s reasonable. Measures such as reducing the number of pre-election voting days in Georgia (there are zero in Biden’s Delaware) or ending pandemic-inspired measures such as drive-thru voting in Harris County, Texas, are not the same. Not even close.

Early in his speech, Biden denounced “the Big Lie,” a reference to Donald Trump’s claims that he actually won the 2020 election. But Biden’s Jim Crow charge is an even clearer instance of the Big Lie — and a more dangerous one since it’s unlikely to be fact-checked by most media. If you want people to condemn a Big Lie, don’t tell one yourself.

In his criticism of Trump, Biden invoked a long-standing norm of American politics. “In America, if you lose, you accept the results. You follow the Constitution. You try again. You don’t call the facts ‘fake’ and then try to bring down the American experiment just because you’re unhappy.”

He spoke these words, apparently unaware that they could be applied to him and his own party.

You might not understand this if your only news sources were the New York Times or CNN. But if you try to look at it, as Darryl Cooper does in the leftist Glenn Greenwald’s Substack, you might recall that Hillary Clinton and other Democrats did not accept the results of the 2016 election and spent months advancing the Russia collusion hoax to delegitimize and end the Trump presidency.

“We now know,” Cooper writes, “that the FBI and other intelligence agencies conducted covert surveillance against members of the Trump campaign based on evidence manufactured by political operatives working for the Clinton campaign, both before and after the election.”

He goes on: “We know that those involved with the investigation knew that accusations of collusion were part of a campaign ‘approved by Hillary Clinton … to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service.'”

As Cooper notes, for months, many Trump supporters worried that there might be substance to the Russia collusion charges. Democrats insisted there was. News media such as the New York Times and CNN ignored or ridiculed efforts by the likes of House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes to show there was nothing there.

Nunes was right, as became apparent when special counsel Robert Mueller admitted in his report and in his pathetic performance on Capitol Hill, that he had no evidence of collusion. But the New York Times and other papers didn’t return the Pulitzers they won for their Russia collusion stories.

New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet acknowledged in an angry newsroom meeting, “The day Bob Mueller walked off the witness stand … [o]ur readers who want Donald Trump to go away suddenly thought, ‘Holy s***, Bob Mueller is not going to do it.’” As a result, “We’re a little tiny bit flat-footed. I mean, that’s what happens when a story looks a certain way for two years.” “A little tiny bit flat-footed,” translated into English, means “dead wrong.”

Have Baquet or other news media leaders confessed error for their misjudgments? Have any Democrats who pursued the Russia collusion hoax like Inspector Javert confessed error? Not that I’ve seen…”

When you think our education system can’t get worse or our teachers can’t be more stupid…

Art prof claims enforcing rules at public schools is racist

We live in the age of stupid

Hard not to laugh at these preening nitwits. I hope they’re all okay.

Providence schools segregate based on race, destroy books not approved by the apparatchiks, deny the Holocaust. Can education get worse?

Providence Teachers Union Confirms Affinity Group Segregation, Historical Books Destroyed, Holocaust Education Ended (Ramona Bessinger Update)

You can’t make it up.

The wacky left has captured our education system and destroyed it.

This is the USA. Freedom will not be tolerated!

I’m so old I can remember when all the leading Democrats were anti-vax and the liberal media loved it.

https://twitter.com/KyleMartinsen_/status/1416094954603044864

Doug Santo