Author: Doug Santo

Geologist | Author | Photographer
Posted on

Biden preaches racial hate and grievance. Seeks to drive a wedge between Americans.

Biden: GOP’s “Jim Crow In The 21st Century” Is Now “Targeting Not Just Voters Of Color”

Biden starts at about the 34 minute mark. Hate, race, grievance, identity politics. That’s what the Democrats have. They won’t let go of it. It’s like Covid hysteria, masks, endless boosters. It’s like climate hysteria, 10 years to save the earth, the ice caps are melting, storms, fires!

Reject this fear politics. It is garbage.

Posted on

The wacky left has captured our education system and destroyed it.

School district racially segregates students, threatens them for ‘biased’ statements: lawsuit

Posted on

Some good did come from the CNN Biden Townhall…

Question asked.

Some answers:

The first is my favorite.

https://twitter.com/Forever_a_bat/status/1451421950094553091

https://twitter.com/KyleHooten2/status/1451367916167966721

Image

Posted on

White House Spins To “Provide Context” for Biden “Misstatements” in Townhall

Humiliation for Biden as Psaki walks back his town hall words: President does NOT have the power to mobilize National Guard to fix shortages and he misstated policy with vow to defend Taiwan from China, WH press sec says

    • A White House official said that the Biden administration is ‘not actively pursuing the use of the National Guard on a federal level’
    • ‘Requesting the use of the National Guard at the state level is under the purview of governors,’ the official clarified
    • ‘The answer is yes,’ the president said Thursday, asked if he would send in the guard to alleviate supply chain issues
    • Asked if he would consider sending in the guard to drive trucks, the president said: ‘Yes, if we can’t increase the number of truckers’

Some headlines to summarize the President’s Townhall performance:

Biden Says He Guesses He Should Visit Southern Border, But Notes He’s Been Busy

Joe Claims No Time to Visit Border Despite 24 Trips Home to Delaware

Biden Falsely Claims Just 2M Had Vax When He Came In: Real Number was 16M

Open To Killing Filibuster On Voting Rights, ‘Maybe More’  The say anything, do anything strategy to get what you want in the moment.

Repeats Debunked Claim That Multitrillion-Dollar Bill Costs ‘Zero’

Biden Admits He Doesn’t Have Answer For High Gas Prices

Backflip: White House Contradicts Joe Biden’s Promise to Defend Taiwan

Biden: Police, Emergency Responders Should Be Fired if They Won’t Get Vaccinated

Charles Hurt: Democrat Nightmare – They Went to Bed with Obama, Woke Up with Biden

Posted on

Fauci and Collins should be investigated for their funding of the Chinese lab and their repeated lies about it.

The Wuhan Lab Cover-Up

“…We still don’t know if a lab accident at the Wuhan Institute of Virology caused the COVID-19 global pandemic. But now we do know for certain that there was a cover-up — and that private organizations and the U.S. government either hid information or misled the public regarding several key details about the kinds of research that the U.S. taxpayers were indirectly funding at the Wuhan labs…”

Related:

Related:

Kenneth Clark on definition of words and authoritarian governments and suppression of information:

Related:

Posted on

Tulsi Gabbard – “…This is about the establishment elite trying to hold on to their power and continue to increase it…”

‘Establishment Elite … Will Target You, Censor You, Demonize You And Call You A Domestic Terrorist,’ Says Tulsi Gabbard

“This is a bigger problem than Democrats or Republicans,” Gabbard told host Will Cain. “This is about the establishment elite trying to hold on to their power and continue to increase it. And the mainstream media is a powerful arm of that establishment elite,” she continued, noting that politicians are either “with them, agreeing with them, supporting them, carrying the water for them.”

Posted on

FBI in crowd during January 6 Capital riot, may have instigated crowd to enter the Capital

Posted on

Loudoun School Board should resign en masse. They are liars.

Posted on

CNN Biden Townhall a ratings failure

Posted on

Headline of the day – border wall around Biden Residence not at the border edition

DHS pays $460,000 to build ‘border wall’ around Biden’s Delaware beach house

Posted on

National School Boards Association apologizes for “domestic terrorists” letter to AG Garland. Garland admitted under questioning in House hearing that his memo targeting the FBI/DOJ on American parents concerned about CRT training was based entirely on the NSBA letter.

Here is Garland being questioned by Jim Jordan:

It looks like the predicate Mr. Garland used to focus police agencies and other entities of the US government onto concerned American parents who reject Critical Race Theory has just fallen apart. There was not much there in the first place.

What a disgusting failure this man is. Just another lefty ideologue.

In addition it appears that his family directly benefits from the sales and distribution of CRT materials to local school districts. Below is the questioning of Garland by Congressman Johnson from Louisiana on conflicts with his son in-law’s selling of CRT materials. Watch. Evaluate Garland responses for yourself, especially in the light of the apology letter from the NSBA.

Related:

Posted on

Emerald Robinson presents an interesting analysis of a lawsuit in Colorado relating to Dominion Voting Systems

The U.S. Government & The Third-Party Vendor Are One

“…Earlier this month, a rather extraordinary lawsuit was filed in Colorado on behalf of eight Michigan poll watchers against the most infamous third-party vendor in the world. (For the duration of this article, let’s call that overly litigious entity: Opinion Voting Systems or OVS.) The details contained in that lawsuit are striking for a number of reasons, and not the least of them is the “Lawfare” strategy that OVS employed to silence any criticism of the company. (The entire lawsuit can be found here.) This “lawsuit warfare” campaign was so extensive that it (allegedly) chilled the free speech of regular Americans who volunteered as poll watchers and didn’t make any public statements about the company at all:

As part of this campaign, OVS publicly boasted, with the assistance of
Hamilton Place Strategies, LLC (“HPS”)—OVS’s Public Relations Firm—on its website and in interviews that its lawyers, Clare Locke, LLP (“Clare Locke”) sent letters to over 150 individuals demanding they cease and desist from “taking part in defaming OVS and to preserve all documents and communications that may be relevant to OVS’s [unspecified] pending claims” and threatened ruinous “imminent” litigation—even if the recipients of the letters did not make any public statements about OVS.

These were odd and intimidating letters. They informed people that the letter was “your formal notice to cease and desist taking part in defaming OVS and to preserve all documents and communications” without listing exactly where or how the person had “defamed” OVS in any way.

That’s not all. In these letters, OVS (and its lawyers) demanded that recipients “confirm receipt of this letter and that you intend to adhere to our request to retain documents” without providing any address or contact information to do so. The letters demanded the retraction of statements that were never identified. They demanded the retention of documents that didn’t exist:

Said another way, the Letters were boilerplate directives meant to instill fear
and intimidation. Despite failing to identify the alleged defamation, OVS then illegally demanded these private citizens preserve all communications, emails, texts—private or otherwise—and a host of other materials.

According to the lawyers who filed the suit against OVS, the letters were designed to stop ordinary Americans from talking about election security regardless of the validity of those claims:

For example, Plaintiffs are restricted—according to the Letters—from
speaking about a topic of major public concern: the largest cyber breach in U.S. history. In December 2020, the U.S. government announced it suffered the largest cyber breach in history through the Solar Winds hack. This breach demonstrates how vulnerable electronic voting systems are to hackers because those systems are, directlyor indirectly, connected to the internet. Despite the OVS CEO’s claims that OVS had never used SolarWinds, an archival screenshot of OVS’s website shows a now–erased SolarWinds logo. Based on this evidence, it appears that OVS did use SolarWinds software.

In other words, OVS was (allegedly) trying to suppress the American public from discussing election integrity in general. The “lawfare” letters sent out to these 150 people were merely one part of a much larger campaign to stop anyone from criticizing the results of the 2020 election:

Public debates, audits, and/or investigations of the 2020 General Election are currently being conducted or contemplated by state legislators in Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and other states to ascertain the scale of vulnerabilities and whether they were exploited. By widely publicizing its intimidation campaign, OVS and its co-conspirators seek to intimidate and silence not just Plaintiffs and the Class, but also the public at large from exercising their right to speak and to share their own testimonial evidence relevant to proceedings investigating election fraud in the November 2020 election.

Does this sound like the behavior of a third-party vendor to you? Have you ever heard of a private company waging war against the free speech of its customers? Of course not. These things do not happen for obvious reasons. Lest you think that OVS is just a company with suicidal business practices, the lawsuit drops the most important and explosive allegation contained in any lawsuit filed in America:

OVS has not waged its Lawfare campaign as only a corporate citizen,
but also as a state–actor, i.e., the government. OVS is a state–actor because States across the United States have outsourced their constitutional obligation to run elections by deferring to OVS’s professional experience and contracting out the administration, collection, counting, recording, and auditing of ballot results through voting technology, software, and thousands of hours of technical and election services. For example, Georgia paid OVS roughly $90,000,000 for a complete, end–to–end election solution in their Master Solution contract. In the Master Solution, Georgia specifically stated “[t]he unique abilities, knowledge, and skills of [OVS] constitute a material inducement for State entering into this Agreement.” Such reliance and partnership between OVS and States, according to which OVS itself takes the place of the government, makes OVS’s conduct of elections and all its related activities a state-action. The administration, collection, counting, recording, and auditing of ballot results in elections are inherently a traditional, exclusive public function. So not only have these Americans received Letters from a corporate citizen with tens of millions in annual revenue and private equity support, but they have also been threatened by, in effect, the government itself.

Just read those key sentences again:

The supposedly third-party vendor which presents itself as a private company “is a state actor, i.e., the government.”

“These people have been threatened by, in effect, the government itself.”

That’s why a cyber security expert on stage at Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium said: “The question is: who’s running our elections? I think the third-party vendor is running our elections. I think this has been happening for a long time.”

That’s because the U.S. Government and the third-party vendor are one and the same. These people have been threatened by, in effect, the government itself…”

Posted on

San Francisco bans In-N-Out allows street poop

Doug Santo