BREAKING: Sy Sanders got pushed out of the WH because they blamed her for being the source of CNN’s Kamala hit piece, per WH staffer

— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) December 3, 2021

The 6:00 minute mark is about where you can watch media nitwits in 2019 proclaim how bad our country and MAGA folks are and what a precious victim Jussie Smollett was. Have any of these loud mouth fools come out publicly to correct their public support for Smollett?

Popular liberal society in this country, and by that I mean Democrat society, is pathetic. It is soul-sick. It is twisted to the point of disgusting.

What’s that you smell in the Supreme Court?

Jonathan Turley:

“…In Wednesday’s Supreme Court oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Justice Sonia Sotomayor got a whiff of something she did not like. She said many abortion opponents, including the sponsors of the Mississippi abortion law at issue, hoped her three new colleagues would allow for the reversal or reduction of Roe v. Wade. With Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett listening, she asked, “Will this institution survive the stench” created from such political machinations — and then answered: “I don’t see how it is possible.”

Of course, when justices begin to declare their disgust at the very thought of overturning precedent, there is another detectable scent in the courtroom. Indeed, it felt like a scene from Tennessee Williams’s play, “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof.” The only thing missing was the play’s central character, “Big Daddy” Pollitt, asking: “What’s that smell in this room? … Didn’t you notice a powerful and obnoxious odor of mendacity in this room? There ain’t nothin’ more powerful than the odor of mendacity.”

Justices Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer insisted that overturning Roe in whole or in part would bring ruin upon the court by abandoning the principle of stare decisis, or the respect for precedent. Yet neither showed the same unflagging adherence to precedent when they sought to overturn conservative doctrines. Notably, Sotomayor pointed out another allegedly “political” decision in the court’s recognition of an individual right to bear arms; she and Breyer both indicated a willingness to overturn the ruling in that case, District of Columbia v. Heller. After that decision, both continued to dissent and argue that “the Framers did not write the Second Amendment in order to protect a private right of armed self-defense.” Indeed, they may reaffirm that position this term.

Sotomayor’s nose for judicial politics was also less sensitive when she recently called upon students to campaign against abortion laws — a major departure from the court’s apolitical traditions. After telling the students that “You know, I can’t change Texas’s law, but you can and everyone else who may or may not like it can go out there and be lobbying forces in changing laws that you don’t like.” She added: “I am pointing out to that when I shouldn’t because they tell me I shouldn’t.” That was more than a whiff of politics, but the same legal commentators applauding her “stench” comment were silent in condemning her direct call for political action on abortion. There also were few objections to the stench of politics when the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg publicly opposed a presidential candidate…”

Jussie Smollett Claims He Can’t Be Tried Because Last Night While Walking Home He Was Murdered https://t.co/VsIO18kg1h

— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) December 2, 2021

Related:

Clown show: Jussie Smollett’s defense attorney accuses the judge of physically lunging at her, snarling, leaves courtroom in tears with her mother.

Psaki Blames Americans for Biden’s Broken Promise to ‘Shut Down the Virus’

“Threatening the Supreme Court has become something of a required public exhibition of faith for Democrats.”

Labor Department reports 210,000 new jobs created in November, far below expectations

Jersey’s most vulnerable to be offered fourth Covid jab

The vaccines are not all they are cracked up to be they should be focused on the at risk population, not the entire population. The drive to vaccinate everybody is a mistake.

Cowboys Prepare For Thursday Night Game Missing 9 Players And Coaches Due To COVID-19

Loudoun Country Schools charges $36,000 for public records search on sexual assault

Two more Harris aides leaving in addition to Sanders

“…Two more aides working in Vice President Harris’s office are expected to leave their roles in the coming weeks in addition to the two high-profile exits of her press secretary and communications director, a source familiar with the departures confirmed to The Hill

Peter Velz, who is the vice president’s director of press operations, and Vince Evans, the deputy director of the Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs for Harris, are planning to leave those positions soon, the source confirmed…”

People come and go, but she has an unusually high turn over rate.

Richard Daley Mayor of Chicago from 1955 to 1976. This clip is from 1968.

StockingStuffer! pic.twitter.com/sHerjTDhQn

— Kevin Downey, Jr. or The Sequel (@kevindowneyjr) December 1, 2021

Trump Book Sells Out, Barnes And Noble Declare ‘Bestseller’

Dobbs abortion case threatens Democrats’ house of cards

WASHINGTON EXAMINER:

“…There is one thing that every serious legal scholar, regardless of his or her opinion on abortion, can agree on: The 1973 Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade is a goofy ad hoc abomination of a legal decision. Don’t take our word for it — take the word of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who called it a “heavy-handed judicial intervention” and “difficult to justify.”

Roe removed the issue of abortion from the democratic process. It also created a new right to kill one’s baby in utero. In deciding Roe, Justice Harry Blackmun and the Roe court set out to create a new version of women’s equality that the original suffragists would have soundly rejected. They did not care what sort of shoddy reasoning they needed to get there, and it really shows.

The abortion case that will be argued before the justices today, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, offers them an opportunity to revisit Roe and its progeny — cases that have caused the United States to depart dramatically and unjustifiably from the civilized world when it comes to abortion laws.

Dobbs pertains to a Mississippi law limiting abortion to the first 15 weeks of pregnancy. For context, this law is still among the world’s least restrictive. Three-quarters of the world’s nations, including most of Western Europe, ban abortion after 12 weeks — i.e., the first trimester. Consider that if Mississippi’s law is allowed to stand, the Magnolia State will still have abortion laws looser than France. Meanwhile, only seven nations in the entire world, including the U.S., currently permit elective abortions after 20 weeks of gestation, as Roe and subsequent decisions have permitted.

To provide still more context, Democrats in several states have proposed laws to permit abortion right up to the moment of birth. They can still pass such laws even if Roe is overturned. But wouldn’t it be a bit barbaric?

Polls show that most people, regardless of their position on abortion’s legality in principle, support reasonable restrictions such as the one Mississippi is defending. For example, 65% believe that abortion should be illegal after 12 weeks, i.e. after the first trimester, according to a new poll from the Associated Press . This is a typical poll result. If people had been allowed to vote on this issue since the 1970s, laws in states where abortion is legal would probably look a lot like Mississippi’s. That, in addition to the specious legal reasoning behind the original ruling, is a sufficient reason for abolishing Roe and letting the voters decide.

Outside the legal realm, Roe’s legacy has been to make 62 million abortions possible over 48 years. Not only is that greater than the populations of California and Florida combined, but it skews with nearly genocidal disproportion toward the destruction of nascent black lives. According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data, approximately 21 million non-Hispanic black lives have been extinguished directly by abortion since Roe. In some heavily black jurisdictions, such as Washington, D.C., more than one-third of all pregnancies end in termination. This is not inconsistent with the racist views of abortion pioneers such as Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger.

The Left has convinced itself that abortion is popular — that people will angrily come out and vote to defend it. That didn’t happen last month in blue Virginia. Democratic gubernatorial nominee Terry McAuliffe spent millions telling voters that his opponent would sign a restrictive abortion law like the one that had just taken effect in Texas. Exit polling shows that the voters who voted based on abortion actually broke for the Republican, Gov.-elect Glenn Youngkin, by 20 points.

Pro-lifers should not delude themselves. Not all restrictions on abortion will be equally popular. But they have nothing to fear post-Roe in limiting a barbaric practice and working toward the legislative goal of protecting all human life, both inside and outside the womb.

In the meantime, Democrats are so far outside of the mainstream of public opinion on abortion that it has warped their perception. They will not see the collapse coming until after the courts stop holding up their house of cards…”