The Republican Party’s Multiethnic, Working-Class Coalition Is Taking Shape

“…Donald Trump, lifelong conservative “outsider” and populist dissenter from bicoastal “Anywhere” orthodoxy on issues pertaining to trade, immigration and China, coasted to the GOP’s presidential nomination. He did so notwithstanding the all-hands-on-deck pushback from leading right-leaning “Anywhere” bastions, encapsulated by National Review magazine’s dedication of an entire issue to, “Against Trump.” Trump’s subsequent victory in the 2016 general election sent the conservative intellectual movement, as well as the Republican Party itself, into a deep state of introspection.

Trump’s victory was primarily propelled by a white working-class revolt, but the emergence during his presidency of a deeply censorious and anti-American Left—epitomized by the Democrats‘ outrageous conduct during the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation battle and the destructive “1619 riots” last summer—opened the door for a broader working-class, pro-America political coalition. By Election Day 2020, that multiethnic, working-class conservative coalition had begun to take more definite shape. Trump lost a nail-biter of an election, but the GOP made massive inroads in crucial black and Hispanic communities, such as Florida’s Miami-Dade County and the heavily Mexican counties dotting Texas’ Rio Grande Valley.

Now over a year removed from the 2020 presidential election, as President Joe Biden‘s poll numbers plummet and frantic Democrats gird themselves for a 2022 midterm election shellacking, data continues to trickle in supporting the emergence of a “Somewhere”-centric, multiethnic, working-class Republican coalition. In Texas, where former Democratic Representative Beto O’Rourke lost to incumbent Republican Senator Ted Cruz by less than three points in 2018, a new Quinnipiac University poll finds Republican incumbent Governor Greg Abbott, up for reelection in 2022, leading challenger O’Rourke by a whopping 15 points. Abbott outright leads O’Rourke among Texas Hispanic voters, 44 to 41, and Texas Hispanics disapprove of Biden’s job performance by a massive 27-point margin…”

How Jussie Smollett’s hoax unravelled

It won’t be the last time ‘racial hate’ turns out to be false.

“…Jussie Smollett was convicted yesterday evening of staging a racist attack on himself in January 2019. Coming just weeks after Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted in Kenosha and the killers of Ahmaud Arbery were convicted in Georgia, the Smollett case reveals an uncomfortable truth about race in America: that the constant exaggeration, or even invention, of incidents of bias by activists and media members is probably a bigger problem than the residual violent racism that still exists…”

Too much to excerpt here, but well worth your time to click on the link.

 

From inflation to crime, reality painfully crashes the illusions of Biden Democrats

Biden Gaslights America
Blames Low Approval Ratings on People Getting ‘Inaccurate Information’ ‘About Their Situation’

Related:

CNBC: 2022 Election Could Be ‘Historically Bad’ For Democrats

One-Third Say Biden Cheated In 2020, 61% Of GOP, 13% Of Dems

Southern Poverty Dumping $100M To Undermine GOP Voting Safeguards

Related:

Poll: Inflation Is No. 1 Concern, Topping COVID

Biden Brushes Off 39-Year-High Inflation

MALAISE: ‘Just A Bump In The Road,’ Says Clueless Joe

And the cable news response:

Since Trump's final month in office, CNN's increased the average monthly frequency they mention him (from 2.38 per show to a high of 3.39), only dipping below Jan. 2021’s average three times.

MSNBC’s increased from 1.82 in Jan to a high of 3.36 in October pic.twitter.com/7fqvfUNCYg

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 9, 2021

What happened today to @JussieSmollett must never be tolerated in this country. We must stand up and demand that we no longer give this hate safe harbor; that homophobia and racism have no place on our streets or in our hearts. We are with you, Jussie. https://t.co/o8ilPu68CM

— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) January 30, 2019

Related:

.@JussieSmollett is one of the kindest, most gentle human beings I know. I’m praying for his quick recovery.

This was an attempted modern day lynching. No one should have to fear for their life because of their sexuality or color of their skin. We must confront this hate.

— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) January 29, 2019

Have these two icons of modern liberalism heard about the jury verdict in the Smollett trial? If so, where are their tweet corrections for being so wrong about this event?

This may be one of the most disgusting events in recent memory.

Show was wild today. My rant on Jussie Smollett led me to do a drive-by on LeBron James and his Emmett Till comparison in 2017. pic.twitter.com/XoDJXr2Djo

— Jason Whitlock (@WhitlockJason) December 10, 2021

This was one of Chris Cuomos’s producers at CNN. Horrific abuse. https://t.co/ns77NibHj7

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) December 11, 2021

Germany just repeating the past, but on a large scale. https://t.co/I0B24gUQhL pic.twitter.com/lnDOEJ8FhC

— I Want To Talk Now (@iwanttotalk_now) December 11, 2021

https://twitter.com/RadioGenova/status/1469249223489204230

https://twitter.com/AnonCitizenUK/status/1469295538235392010

https://twitter.com/vicderbyshire/status/1469354766560026624

Related:

Vaccinating people who have had covid-19: why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US?

Study: Natural Immunity More Protective Over Time Than COVID-19 Vaccination

“The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.”

One-third say Biden cheated in 2020, 61% of GOP

New study suggests natural immunity is more protective over time than COVID-19 vaccine

Another month of rising prices under Biden:

Gas: +58.1% since last year
Bacon: +21%
Eggs: +8%
Steak: +24.6%
Propane & Firewood: +34.3%
Furniture: 11.8%
Used Cars & Trucks: +31.4%
Coffee: +7.5%
Cigarettes: +9.4%
Hotels & Motels: +25.5%
Car & Truck Rentals: +37.2%
Bikes: +9.4%

— Jacki Kotkiewicz (@jackikotkiewicz) December 10, 2021

Americans are beginning to notice:

CNBC POLL:

Which party would you prefer to control Congress:
44% – Republicans
34% – Democrats
 
🚨 “In the past 20 years, CNBC and NBC surveys have never registered a double-digit Republican advantage on congressional preference…”
https://t.co/gJ9BzfwmLZ

— Election Wizard (@ElectionWiz) December 10, 2021

MSNBC’s primetime hosts completely avoided the Jussie Smollett verdict last night.

In fact, the network’s most-watched shows never even covered the staged hate crime at all since it emerged in 2019, according to transcripts. https://t.co/fY2Wlc6J5h

— Joseph A. Wulfsohn (@JosephWulfsohn) December 10, 2021

If you get your news and opinions from MSNBC it’s on you.

Related:

Who Could Have Seen This Coming? Hospitals That Laid Off Unvaccinated Staff Now ‘Overwhelmed.’

This is spectacular. And it's highly representative of what much of the media is doing regarding the Steele Dossier now that it's been exposed as a fraud. https://t.co/eM3eFZ8rY0

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) December 9, 2021

BOMBSHELL: In court filing, Facebook admits ‘fact checks’ are nothing more than opinion

Anthony Watts:

“…Facebook has admitted in a court of law that such fact checks are not factual at all, but merely opinions.

People send me stuff.

As we have previously reported, journalist John Stossel is suing Facebook after Facebook’s ‘fact checkers’ labeled climate change information that Stossel posted as “false and misleading”. In the middle of all this is the nefarious website “Climate Feedback” which has a bunch of climate zealots that write up what they claim are “fact checks” for articles, videos, and news stories they disagree with.

Facebook just blew the “fact check” claim right out of the water in court.

In its response to Stossel’s defamation claim, Facebook responds on Page 2, Line 8 in the court document (download it below) that Facebook cannot be sued for defamation (which is making a false and harmful assertion) because its ‘fact checks’ are mere statements of opinion rather than factual assertions.

Opinions are not subject to defamation claims, while false assertions of fact can be subject to defamation. The quote in Facebook’s complaint is,

“The labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion.”

So, in a court of law, in a legal filing, Facebook admits that its ‘fact checks’ are not really ‘fact’ checks at all, but merely ‘opinion assertions.’

This strikes me as public relations disaster, and possibly a looming legal disaster for Facebook, PolitiFact, Climate Feedback and other left-leaning entities that engage in biased “fact checking.”

Such “fact checks” are now shown to be simply an agenda to supress free speech and the open discussion of science by disguising liberal media activism as something supposedly factual, noble, neutral, trustworthy, and based on science.

It is none of those…”