Minnesota school board agrees to pay non-white teachers ‘extra stipend’
Justin Trudeau — The Unvaccinated are usually “racist and misogynist.” Liberal politicians worldwide are simply pathetic.
Related:
Canada has a real doozy. So do we:
Democrats and media change the Covid narrative
This week alone:
CNN: Cloth masks don’t work.
CDC Director: PCR tests are unreliable
Fauci: 10 day quarantines can be cut to 5 days now.
Biden: There is no federal solution to beat COVID-19
They are shifting the narrative.
Just in time for the midterms.
— Adam Paul Laxalt (@AdamLaxalt) December 30, 2021
More than 70% of Germans are fully vaxxed. Fully vaxxed are 95% of Omicron cases in Germany. Unvaxxed are 4%.
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1476583826344267777
Related:
Was the January 6 “insurrection” an FBI operation? Why are Democrats so crazy on this?
Fire Garland. https://t.co/y4R0ucF2nZ
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) December 30, 2021
Related:
The plot to “kidnap” the Michigan Governor also appears to be an FBI operation. It appears these operations were undertaken to discredit Trump and Trump voters and label them crazy, white-nationalist terrorists. The media certainly played along.
Biden one year in…
CNN…
Irresponsible Democrat politicians, bureaucrats, and media personalities have destroyed the lives of many weak-minded people…
A friend of mine who’s a commercial pilot just sent me this pic of a passenger on his plane. pic.twitter.com/VVsrdBhbbp
— Phil (@RealPhillyP) December 28, 2021
All this crazy nonsense over a flu strain with a better than 99% recovery rate for most people.
Headline of the day
Jonathan Turley on the Ashley Biden Diary
Ashley Biden’s Diary: Will The FBI Raid The New York Times?
“…The Christmas Eve order for the New York Times to return confidential legal material from the conservative publication, Project Veritas, has led many to decry the imposition of a “prior restraint” on the media. I joined in expressing those concerns about courts preventing a news publication and then ordering the return of material sent by a source. That issue will be now be addressed in the courts. One question, however, remains: when will the FBI raid the home of New York Times publisher, A.G. Sulzberger?
That is what the Justice Department did when Project Veritas was given the diary of President Joe Biden’s daughter, Ashley – the subject of the New York Times story. They raided the home and seized the confidential communications of the founder of Project Veritas, James O’Keefe, as well as others associated with this publication.
Of course, Project Veritas is hardly popular with many in the media as an outfit known for ambush journalism. Yet, both publications were given stolen or abandoned confidential material. The difference in response appears based on source of the material and the political orientation of the publication. Ashley Biden’s diary was deemed a federal issue of such importance that the Administration conducted highly intrusive searches and seizures targeting a publisher. Conversely, the New York Times obtained core attorney-client material that was unlawfully taken from Project Veritas…”
When you’re so confident in your “truth” that you have to censor disbelievers…
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1476241697034186754
Covid is politics. Covid is religion.
Florida Surgeon General claims Biden Administration is “actively preventing” distribution of monoclinal antibody treatments to Florida
NEW: Florida Surgeon General says Biden Admin is "actively preventing" distribution of monoclonal antibodies by pausing shipments of Regeneron, in letter to HHS Sec.
Feds paused Regeneron bc it may not work against Omicron. FL says it can still be used in existing Delta cases. pic.twitter.com/9mmw5SsuZJ
— Jay O'Brien (@jayobtv) December 28, 2021
When politics is more important than effective medical treatments
Meanwhile, the “journalists” over at CNN…
How have Biden’s Covid policies worked? Not so good…
The Flu took a year off…
Flu is making a comeback in US after an unusual year off
You have to be a nitwit to believe the crap the media spews. Flu never took time off. It was with us all along. The tests for Covid could not differentiate between Flu and Covid. Every positive test was interpreted as Covid. The tests themselves were only about 50% accurate anyway.
Related:
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1476209139974127624
Headline of the day
Just how stupid are the mask mandates and vaccine mandates? This stupid…
https://twitter.com/Lucylo1958/status/1475947299369099280
It's almost like they fired hundreds and hundreds of nurses out of spite and rage and vengeance — but forgot that they actually need them.
Just like Alberta, where they're begging @AHS_media employees to come back, after slandering them and suspending them. https://t.co/D8n33N7C2d
— Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 (@ezralevant) December 28, 2021
“I’m going to shut down the virus!”
Another good piece by Igor Chudov on vax effectiveness
Denmark: Vaccine a DANGER to the vaxxed
Igor Chudov:
“…This is a short post — but the two studies cited have incredible implications.
Turns out, as was pointed out many times here, that negative effectiveness of vaccines and rapidly waning (and soon going negative) effectiveness of boosters against Omicron, received another and very important scientific confirmation.
It turns out that just three months after “primary vaccination”, VE against Omicron turns into very negative territory. Instead of being a protective device, like a life jacket, vaccination instead becomes harmful, like a chain attached to an ankle.
Boosters to the Rescue
The mRNA magic soup does restores “protection”, but in a very odd manner:
- the first two weeks past the booster shot give the vaccinee stronly NEGATIVE or at least NO protection (depending on primary series). This is why people who received a booster shot, are not considered “fully boosted” until two weeks pass after the jab. The infections occurring in these first two weeks are not officially counted “against” the booster, overstating effectiveness of this treatment. This is discussed in my article “Boris Johnson’s Biggest Blunder”.
- Then at two weeks, according to the UK, booster becomes great again, and vaccinees enjoy “protection”, however only amounting to measly 55%. However, booster protection starts declining right away. By just extrapolating the line, booster protection may evaporate after about 17 weeks. (nobody knows exactly when, but you get the idea)
- So the boosted have two terrible first weeks, then a few decent weeks, quickly turning into so-so protection, and going to no protection again in 17 weeks, give or take.
If this is not “vaccine failure”, then what is?…”
The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined
Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States
Findings
“…At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days (Fig. 1). In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people. Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days. The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.
Relationship between cases per 1 million people (last 7 days) and percentage of population fully vaccinated across 68 countries as of September 3, 2021 (See Table S1 for the underlying data). Full size image
Across the US counties too, the median new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people in the last 7 days is largely similar across the categories of percent population fully vaccinated (Fig. 2). Notably there is also substantial county variation in new COVID-19 cases within categories of percentage population fully vaccinated. There also appears to be no significant signaling of COVID-19 cases decreasing with higher percentages of population fully vaccinated (Fig. 3).
Median, interquartile range and variation in cases per 100,000 people in the last 7 days across percentage of population fully vaccinated as of September 2, 2021. Full size image
Percentage of counties that experienced an increase of cases between two consecutive 7-day time periods by percentage of population fully vaccinated across 2947 counties as of September 2, 2021. Full size image
Of the top 5 counties that have the highest percentage of population fully vaccinated (99.9–84.3%), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies 4 of them as “High” Transmission counties. Chattahoochee (Georgia), McKinley (New Mexico), and Arecibo (Puerto Rico) counties have above 90% of their population fully vaccinated with all three being classified as “High” transmission. Conversely, of the 57 counties that have been classified as “low” transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% (15) have percentage of population fully vaccinated below 20%.
Since full immunity from the vaccine is believed to take about 2 weeks after the second dose, we conducted sensitivity analyses by using a 1-month lag on the percentage population fully vaccinated for countries and US counties. The above findings of no discernable association between COVID-19 cases and levels of fully vaccinated was also observed when we considered a 1-month lag on the levels of fully vaccinated (Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Figure 2).
We should note that the COVID-19 case data is of confirmed cases, which is a function of both supply (e.g., variation in testing capacities or reporting practices) and demand-side (e.g., variation in people’s decision on when to get tested) factors.
Interpretation
The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined, especially considering the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant and the likelihood of future variants. Other pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions may need to be put in place alongside increasing vaccination rates. Such course correction, especially with regards to the policy narrative, becomes paramount with emerging scientific evidence on real world effectiveness of the vaccines…”