Jack Smith targets Trump campaign chief Susie Wiles

Corrupt.

Politically motivated persecution using the levers of federal power.

It is a disgrace.

A base transmogrification of the American legal system.

Related:

Sure Looks Like ‘the Integrity’ of the DOJ Needs Investigating

Hunter Biden prosecutor refusing to cooperate with Congress, but adjusts earlier story

With scandal revelations, Joe Biden couldn’t get a CIA security clearance, intel experts say

Soledad O’Brien tries to shame Asian-American immigrant over affirmative action

Beautiful outside. Ugly racist inside.

Someone has hacked your account and is publicly endorsing racial discrimination.

— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) July 1, 2023

You notice a theme from the left of indignantly scolding members of minority groups for their lack of gratitude and loyalty.

'I saved you, now I own you.' https://t.co/SkNcHo9CqJ

— Chad Felix Greene 🇮🇱 (@chadfelixg) July 1, 2023

I can’t help but observe that a few prominent African Americans seem to wish that Black citizens have a monopoly on racism — and display resentment towards other minorities who also have a claim on racial discrimination.

Whoopi Golberg’s recent statement that “the Holocaust was…

— R2DHue ⭐️⭐️⭐️🌟   𝕏 (@R2DHue) July 1, 2023

Joe Biden Says He Wants To Crack Down on ‘Privilege’ in Education. He Once Called UPenn’s President To Get His Granddaughter In

“…Shortly after the Supreme Court declared affirmative action college admission policies unconstitutional, President Joe Biden said his administration would direct the Department of Education to scrutinize how “practices like legacy admissions … expand privilege instead of opportunity.”

In 2018, Hunter Biden tapped his father and a number of Biden family connections to help get his daughter into the University of Pennsylvania. Text messages and emails from Hunter Biden’s laptop, reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon, show how Joe and Hunter Biden worked behind the scenes to get a subpar family member into one of the most selective schools in the country.

Maisy Biden’s college admissions process could raise a number of uncomfortable questions for the president. The saga highlights exactly the kind of “legacy admissions” Biden has slammed. The story also highlights the Biden family’s occasionally shady dealings with the University of Pennsylvania just as congressional Republicans are probing alleged ethical misconduct by both Joe and Hunter Biden…”

Ex-NY state senator is ridiculed for complaining online about her $206,000 student debt in wake of Supreme Court ax on loan forgiveness plan – despite recently buying $1MILLION home in ritzy Bedford

• • Former New York State Senator Alessandra Biaggi was ridiculed for tweeting about her student debt on Friday
  • Social media users poked fun at the fact she had purchased a home worth over a million dollars just this time last year
  • Biaggi tweeted following the decision from the Supreme Court to strike down President Biden’s student loan-forgiveness plan

White House cautiously opens the door to study blocking sun’s rays to slow global warming

This is being considered by the “White House.”

We live in the age of absurd stupidity.

What could go wrong?

Related:

White House says it’s open to plan that would BLOCK sunlight from hitting surface of the Earth in bid to limit global warming

• • The White House has opened the door to an audacious ‘geoengineering’ plan 
  • The idea would block sunlight from the earth’s surface to fight global warming
  • Scientists have warned the practice could have devastating effects   

Controversial Boston City Councilor driving with ‘revoked license’ crashes car with son inside into house

“…A controversial, defund-the-police Boston City Councilor crashed her car into a house, injuring herself and her 7-year-old son.

Kendra Lara, 33, was driving with a “revoked license” in an unregistered car without insurance and an expired inspection sticker and her son, Zaire, was not in a booster seat at the time of the crash, according to a police report obtained by The Post…”

EXCLUSIVE: Berkeley Law School dean Erwin Chemerinsky explains how he has secretly enacted a policy of racial discrimination in faculty hiring—which is illegal in California.

"If I'm ever deposed, I'm going to deny I said this to you." pic.twitter.com/GYgtNZfhtb

— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) June 29, 2023

Boston University law students offered therapy in response to recent Supreme Court decisions

“…Law students were sent mental health resources to help ‘navigate these times’…”

In a bold move for LGBTQ+ rights, the Supreme Court will now allow college students to assign pronouns to the loans they have to pay back. pic.twitter.com/50SMjdldQg

— U.S. Ministry of Truth (@USMiniTru) June 30, 2023

You don't need to own books. We'll make sure the right version is always electronically available.

— U.S. Ministry of Truth (@USMiniTru) April 30, 2022

Mood.. 😊 pic.twitter.com/0vbfbv5iqC

— Buitengebieden (@buitengebieden) July 1, 2023

Crackpot is more like it.

We live in the age of stupid.

TOP NIH OFFICIAL ADVISED COVID SCIENTISTS THAT HE USES PERSONAL EMAIL TO EVADE FOIA

“…A top advisor to Anthony Fauci at the National Institutes of Health admitted that he used a personal email account in an apparent effort to evade the strictures of the Freedom of Information Act, according to records obtained by congressional investigators probing the origin of Covid-19. The official also expressed his intention to delete emails in order to avoid media scrutiny…”

NEW: Video from source in Eagle Pass shows Border Patrol cutting through razor wire placed by the state of TX to allow migrants to enter & be processed after crossing illegally. @TxDPS tells me this is the first time they know of this happening, and that it’s being looked into… pic.twitter.com/jESPbzj9sw

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) June 30, 2023

Biden’s “Normal”: The President’s Constitutional Takes are Becoming More Unhinged from History

“…The decision of the Supreme Court to end the use of race in college admissions was not unexpected. Indeed, the rulings in cases involving Harvard and the University of North Carolina ended decades of muddled 5-4 decisions. Yet, President Joe Biden seemed to go into full attack mode and actually claimed that the Court gutted the constitutional guarantee that “all men and women are created equal.” In declaring that this Court was not “normal,” Biden further insisted that these admissions decisions and the Dobbs abortion decision reversed the gains that “we fought a war over in 1860” to secure.

In an interview on MSNBC’s “Deadline: White House,” President Biden accused the Court of ignoring what “the Constitution says: We hold these truths to be self-evident, all men and women are created equal, endowed by their creator.” That is actually a reference to the Declaration of Independence, but it was the substance of the point that was so baffling…”

Sotomayor dissent in Christian designer case makes false claim about Pulse nightclub shooting

“…Despite Sotomayor’s assertion, however, the FBI and other law enforcement were unable to verify any claims that Mateen was gay, frequented gay bars or even knew the Pulse nightclub was a gay bar.

Mateen’s final selection of Pulse as his target appears to have been made based on the lack of security, not because it was a gay club, and made at the last minute, according to court and phone records that emerged in the case against Mateen’s widow, who was put on trial for allegedly aiding and abetting her late husband.

Mateen reportedly Googled “Orlando nightclubs” after finding that security at his original target, a major shopping and entertainment complex, was too high…

…Gorsuch lambasted Sotomayor’s dissent, saying it “reimagines the facts” from “top to bottom” and fails to answer the fundamental question: “Can a State force someone who provides her own expressive services to abandon her conscience and speak its preferred message instead?”…”

Related. Liberal jurisprudence meet liberal environmental reporting:

AP Uncovers Real Problem With Canada’s Wildfire Smoke: It’s Racist

Happy cows.. 😊 pic.twitter.com/whUsjdcuL8

— Buitengebieden (@buitengebieden) June 30, 2023

Held: The First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing a website designer to create expressive designs speaking messages with which the designer disagrees

“…The First Amendment’s protections belong to all, not just to speakers whose motives the government finds worthy. In this case, Colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance. In the past, other States in Barnette, Hurley, and Dale have similarly tested the First Amendment’s boundaries by seeking to compel speech they thought vital at the time. But abiding the Constitution’s commitment to the freedom of speech means all will encounter ideas that are “misguided, or even hurtful.” Hurley, 515 U. S., at 574. Consistent with the First Amendment, the Nation’s answer is tolerance, not coercion. The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands. Colorado cannot deny that promise consistent with the First Amendment. Pp. 15–19, 24–25…”

And commenting on the dissent:

“…In some places, the dissent gets so turned around about the facts that it opens fire on its own position. For instance: While stressing that a Colorado company cannot refuse “the full and equal enjoyment of [its] services” based on a customer’s protected status, post, at 27, the dissent assures us that a company selling creative services “to the public” does have a right “to decide what messages to include or not to include,” post, at 28. But if that is true, what are we even debating?…

And

…Finally, the dissent comes out and says what it really means: Once Ms. Smith offers some speech, Colorado “would require [her] to create and sell speech, notwithstanding [her] sincere objection to doing so”—and the dissent would force her to comply with that demand. Post, at 29–30. Even as it does so, however, the dissent refuses to acknowledge where its reasoning leads. In a world like that, as Chief Judge Tymkovich highlighted, governments could force “an unwilling Muslim movie director to make a film with a Zionist message,” they could compel “an atheist muralist to accept a commission celebrating Evangelical zeal,” and they could require a gay website designer to create websites for a group advocating against same-sex marriage, so long as these speakers would accept commissions from the public with different messages. 6 F. 4th, at 1199 (dissenting opinion). Perhaps the dissent finds these possibilities untroubling because it trusts state governments to coerce only “enlightened” speech. But if that is the calculation, it is a dangerous one indeed…”

Outstanding