Democrats’ Strategy Against The Trump Economy? Schizophrenia

I&I Editorial

“…It is extremely difficult if not impossible to defeat an incumbent president when the economy is doing well. Just ask 1984 Democratic nominee Fritz Mondale, or 1996 Republican nominee Bob Dole.

In the case of Donald Trump, the economy isn’t just healthy; it’s reached unprecedented milestones. America is enjoying the longest expansion in history. Unemployment reached and remains near a 50-year low. Nearly 7 million full-time jobs have been generated under Trump, including nearly a half million manufacturing jobs, after two decades of serious manufacturing decline widely viewed as irreversible.

There are two tacks from which to choose in confronting this politically. Democrats can argue that our prosperity is grossly exaggerated. Or they can claim they deserve the credit for the Trump economy.

Which of these strategies, both decidedly dubious in their chances of success, have the Democrats picked?

Both.

House Majority Whip James Clyburn is considered a kingmaker in the upcoming Democratic primary in his home state of South Carolina, where black support is vital. “I talk to African Americans. I go to church with them. And I know they’re not doing better,” Clyburn told ABC on Sunday. “If you go with unemployment numbers to determine people’s status, then you have to say that slaves were in very good shape because they were fully employed,” the House’s number three Democrat added. Later in the week, Clyburn repeated himself to Fox’s Neil Cavuto.

What an insult to more than 19½ million of Clyburn’s fellow blacks currently working, to suggest that they’re not really laboring for themselves and that their jobs are lacking in dignity.

Similar to Clyburn’s contention that employment statistics don’t really have value as an economic indicator, Nobel economics laureate, Bill Clinton economic adviser, and “Third Way” theorist Joseph Stiglitz has actually called for the abandonment of using gross domestic product to measure economic health. Sore losers always blame the rules when their opponents win…”

Original

Trump wins another Democrat debate

The Incredible Shrinking Candidate

Charles Hurt:

“…Welcome, Mr. Bloomberg, to the 2020 presidential campaign that you are supposed to salvage for Democrats.

It was almost painful to watch all the blows landed on the bewildered Mr. Bloomberg, the savior with the invisible campaign. Last night, Mr. Bloomberg was the Incredible Shrinking Candidate.

Which is a really terrible thing when you already start out so tiny.

The whole debate offers an astonishing indictment of the current Democratic Party that a guy like Mr. Bloomberg can rocket to the top of the heap without a single day of actual campaigning and in spite of his political record.

Just a few elections back, he endorsed former President George W. Bush, a Republican, for reelection. Heck, Mr. Bloomberg himself was a Republican more recently than that.

And in 2012, Mr. Bloomberg only begrudgingly endorsed former President Barack Obama — a Democrat — for reelection just days before the election. Today, of course, Mr. Bloomberg is running tens of millions of dollars worth of ads claiming that he was a crucial right-hand man of Mr. Obama’s during his presidency.

To understand just how devastating this crack-up of the Democratic Party is, consider this: The only candidate other than Mr. Bloomberg who has a shot at the nomination refuses to actually join the Democratic Party. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont is a “Democratic Socialist.”

Even now since Mr. Bloomberg officially switched his party registration to “Democrat,” he is a curious candidate for the party to run against President Trump in November.

First is his towering arrogance. In a memo released by his campaign this week, Mr. Bloomberg’s staff wag their fingers at all the actual Democrats in the race and say they must abandon their own campaigns to make way for Mr. Bloomberg.

Of former Vice President Joe Biden (Mr. Obama’s actual right-hand man during his presidency), Mr. Bloomberg’s campaign officials warned, “his continued presence in the race — along with that of [Pete] Buttigieg, and [Amy] Klobuchar — will siphon votes away from the best performing Sanders-alternative (Mike Bloomberg) and increase the likelihood of a Sanders blowout.”

This from a guy who presently has earned exactly ZERO delegates, lecturing four people who have at least proven they can win a delegate.

And then the first words out of his mouth during his first live appearance on a debate stage, he declared that Mr. Sanders — the odds-on favorite to win the Democratic nomination — will never beat Mr. Trump in the general election.

And then there was the rest of the debate. It was almost like Mr. Bloomberg joined the stage to give Mr. Biden a hand. I mean, next to Mr. Bloomberg, Mr. Biden came off like a brain surgeon.

It was so bad, Joe Biden could actually turn around and win South Carolina next week. All thanks to Mike Bloomberg…”

Original

Bloomberg Bombs in Vegas Debut

Susan Crabtree:

“…LAS VEGAS — In this desert city built on hopes, dreams and neon lights, former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg made a wild gamble to emerge from the protective bubble of his $400 million ad campaign and face five rivals for the Democratic nomination head-on in a nationally televised debate.

The high-stakes debut ended up as a bust – all under the glare of the intense media spotlight.

Bloomberg, who decided to skip the early voting primary and caucus states in favor of delegate-rich Super Tuesday, wasn’t ready for prime time. He seemed detached, unprepared, and out of touch with working-class voters. The media and financial mogul was surging before Wednesday night, but limped away from the stage having accomplished the opposite of what he set out to do.

The much-ballyhooed billionaire, touted as the savior who could rescue the Democratic Party from itself – or rather, from its insurgent socialist wing — and take the fight to Donald Trump with an endless supply of cash, took a beating from the other candidates and the debate moderators. And the end of the night it must have seemed apparent to him that he’d brought a wallet to a knife fight. Bernie Sanders, the man Bloomberg set out to stop, emerged from the night virtually unscathed…”

Original

Nitwit headline of the day

WaPo Opinion Piece Calls For Elites to Have a ‘Bigger Say in Choosing President’

Sure, sweetheart. Good luck with that.

Journalism by some, partisan political hackery by others

Campaign Donations Show Letter Demanding Barr’s Resignation Comes From Leftist Hacks Pretending To Be ‘Bipartisan’

Guess which side was responsible for partisan political hackery?

The attack on Barr, the real reason

Bonchie:

“…I’m fairly skeptical about the idea that people will actually be prosecuted over Durham’s investigation into the origins of Crossfire Hurricane. Even if he’s got rock-solid cases, it’s unlikely a D.C. grand jury will move to indict an anti-Trump figure. But there’s no doubt his report is going to be a big indictment of the misconduct that took place.

What’s the best way to limit the impact of his findings? The simple answer is to try to discredit him and Barr before the report drops. That’s what all this is really about. It’s not about respect for the law, concern about corruption, or any other nonsense. These are the same people who sat idly by through numerous scandals during previous presidential terms. This is simply about being deluded over Donald Trump’s mere existence and seeking to stop Barr from exposing the corruption that took place during the Trump-Russia investigation.

Barr isn’t going to resign though. He’s all in on this issue, and whether these careerists like it or not, the daylight is coming for what their department did…”

Original

On border wall construction

“…The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced it will waive nearly a dozen federal contracting regulations in order to expedite construction of up to 177 miles of border wall. The laws being waived include “requirements for having open competition, justifying selections and receiving all bonding from a contractor before any work can begin,” according to the Associated Press.

DHS chief Chad Wolf is reportedly operating under broad authority to construct border barriers granted to him by a 2005 law which passed unanimously in the Senate.

“The Trump administration said it expects the waivers will allow 94 miles (150 kilometers) of wall to be built this year, bringing the Republican president closer to his pledge of about 450 miles (720 kilometers) since taking office and making it one of his top domestic priorities,” the AP reports. “It said the other 83 miles (133 kilometers) covered by the waivers may get built this year.”

Wolf said he hopes the move “will accelerate some of the construction that’s going along the Southwest border.”

“A border wall system, for many years and under previous administrations, was very bipartisan and non-political,” Wolf told Fox and Friends. “It’s only in this administration that a number of Democrats and others choose not to secure our border, so the President has made the decision that if he’s not going to get the funding and resources from Congress, then he’s going to use existing resources and existing authority — not only from the Department of Homeland Security, but also from [Department of Defense].”

“So we are securing that border. We’re building that border wall system, and we’re looking forward to finishing those miles later this year.”…”

Original

Iran Without Delusions

Editorial of The New York Sun:

“…Good going to Secretary of State Pompeo for calling out a group of Democrats — including, apparently, Secretary of State Kerry — for reportedly meeting with the Iranians on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference, and in secret. Mr. Pompeo was responding to a report of the parley in the Federalist. “If they met,” the secretary said, “I don’t know what they said. I hope they were reinforcing America’s foreign policy, not their own.”

Fat chance. The notion that they might be reinforcing America’s foreign policy was mocked by Senator Christopher Murphy, the Connecticut Democrat who led the delegation. He had been stonewalling reports of the meeting for days. Then Mr. Murphy posted a confession to meeting the Iranian, though he did, according to the Times, acknowledge that he lacks standing to “conduct diplomacy on behalf of the whole of the U.S. government.”

Mr. Murphy’s view is that “if [President] Trump isn’t going to talk to Iran, then someone should.” In other words, he’s going to defy the decision of the elected government of America to refrain from rushing into talks with the Iranian camarilla. He’s going to instead take it upon his own unauthorized self. Mr. Murphy says he has “no delusions” about Iran, but his actions belie that boast.

Particularly because Secretary of State Kerry was there. He has honed a modus operandi of freelancing foreign policy, against the wishes of the White House or Congress. That goes all the way back to Vietnam, when Mr. Kerry, after a few months with the Swift Boats, quit the Navy and went to Paris to treat with the enemy. Then he came back to America and parlayed the enemy’s key points to Congress.

It’s worth remembering what the key point was, too, though we’ve already reprised it in these columns. Mr. Kerry’s key point was that if we were to abandon Free Vietnam, the enemy would let us go in peace. This led to one of the most ghastly moments ever to take place in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. That’s when Mr. Kerry, wearing a rumpled uniform, was questioned by the anti-war Senator, George Aiken of Vermont.

“Do you believe the North Vietnamese would seriously undertake to impede our complete withdrawal?” Aiken asked.

“No, I do not believe that the North Vietnamese would, and it has been clearly indicated at the Paris peace talks they would not,” Mr. Kerry warbled.

Then Aiken thought of something that was, to him, funny.

“Do you think they might help carry the bags for us?” the senator asked. Laughter erupted.

“I would say they would be more prone to do that than the army of the South Vietnamese,” Mr. Kerry responded.

What a thigh-slapper. That was met with not only laughter but applause. At what were they laughing and applauding? Why, at the predicament of the hundreds of thousands of Free Vietnamese soldiers, who had fought for years for freedom and were going to get rounded up for communist reeducation, and the millions of Vietnamese civilians, who’d bet on America and faced a similar fate. It may have been a horrifying moment, but it did set Mr. Kerry on the road to high office.

Where Mr. Kerry has pursued the same m.o. When he became Secretary of State, he used his power to pursue normal relations with Communist Cuba. He did that even though the Congress had made clear it was not ready to abandon the preconditions set by the law known as Helms Burton. In Havana, Mr. Kerry mocked Americans who’d stood with the Free Cuba movement as “prisoners of history.”

Then he tried a similar stunt with Iran, in what is known as the Iran deal. Remember, Mr. Kerry knew the Iran deal was opposed by both houses of Congress. He still took it to the United Nations, where the Obama administration voted against America’s own Congress. They started flying planeloads of cash to Iran for use, it turns out, in attacks against, among others, our own GIs.

Upon which Americans gave the presidency to the one candidate who, in Donald Trump, vowed to exit the Iran deal. So Mr. Pompeo is the one without delusions. He reminded the international press that Mr. Zarif is “foreign minister for a country that shot down an airliner and has yet to turn over the black boxes … that killed an American on December 27 … that is the world’s largest state sponsor of terror and the world’s largest sponsor of anti-Semitism.”…”

Original

Doug Santo