Diversity and inclusion monitors to join faculty hiring committees at SDSU.
Higher learning or forced conformity to liberal orthodoxy?
Higher learning or forced conformity to liberal orthodoxy?
The snow is melting already! š pic.twitter.com/ppDkNunXPl
— Karli Bonneā šŗšø (@KarluskaP) March 10, 2020
I feel sorry about the poor education and poor parenting this young girl has received.
You can’t make this stuff up!
NEW: House Majority Whip James Clyburn tells NPR if Bernie Sanders doesn't win any states tonight, the Democratic National Committee should "shut this primary down" and "cancel the rest of these debates." https://t.co/qdk7LADWXk pic.twitter.com/ZxbEOb6hPl
— NPR Politics (@nprpolitics) March 11, 2020
If Clyburn says it is a foregone conclusion, why would anyone disagree?
On the other hand, Tuberville seems like a decent guy

They are super smart!
Nitwit’s are going to nit!
It’s a panic, oh wait, no it’s not!
Elisabeth Dellinger and Todd Bliman:
“…Interviews with professionals uniformly agree on this point. If you use basic math and simply divide the number of deaths by the total number of identified cases, you may think the death rate is 3.4%. But the trouble with this is, again, identification. As Tom Frieden, former director of the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), put it, the 3.4% rate āis certainly an overestimate.ā The reason: Limited testing means many mild cases went unidentified. At a panel discussion Friday on Capitol Hill, Johns Hopkinsā Dr. Tom Inglesby stated that roughly 80% of known cases were mild. So mild that patients recovered with no hospitalization or medical intervention. (Some 15% did need hospitalization and 5% critical attention.) Many others likely didnāt even know they had it.
This means we donāt have the right denominator to calculate the death rate. In South Korea, where testing has been more aggressive, Dr. Inglesby noted the death rate was 0.6%. Frieden told Bloomberg reporters he expected the death rate to eventually hover around 1%. Now, that is speculation to an extent, but it is educated speculation that seems logical given the backdrop. That puts the death rate higher than influenza, which CDC estimates killed an average 0.14% of people who contracted it from the 2010/2011 flu season through 2017/2018.[i] But it is far lower than mortality rates tied to 2003ās Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome and other similar outbreaks…”
DAVID CATRON:
“…Itās clear that the Democrats see the coronavirus outbreak as an opportunity rather than an epidemic. Having failed to bring down President Trump with ridiculous conspiracy theories involving Russia and Ukraine, they are desperately attempting to convince the public he is somehow exacerbating the COVID-19 crisis. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, for example, issued a joint press release Sunday that included the following fiction: āPresident Trump continues to manufacture needless chaos within his administration and it is hampering the governmentās response to the coronavirus outbreak.ā Predictably, Pelosi and Schumer fail to provide any objective facts to support this claim.
This is just the latest in a series of irresponsible assertions by the Democrats…”
https://twitter.com/TombStoneWyatt/status/1236695844096741376




They're really excited about the idea of people dying so they can take back control. https://t.co/QbRjdwKGY4
— jimtreacher.substack.com (@jtLOL) March 6, 2020
https://twitter.com/thebradfordfile/status/1236436596964163584
Age onset confusion. Is this a good look for a potential president?