More malfeasance or appearance of same from Biden’s involvement in Ukraine

Obama conference call leaked to Burisma, Biden emails show

“…The Obama administration let a Democratic p.r. company that worked for Ukrainian energy firm Burisma take part in a conference call about an upcoming visit to Ukraine by then-Vice President Joe Biden, emails obtained by The Post show.

An associate at Blue Star Strategies then emailed a memo with minutes of the conference call hosted by the White House to a top Burisma executive, Vadym Pozharskyi, as well as to Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, and Hunter’s business partner, Devon Archer, both of whom sat on Burisma’s board.

The trip, in December 2015, turned out to be the one during which Biden later bragged about forcing Ukrainian officials to fire a state prosecutor who was investigating Burisma by threatening to withhold a $1 billion US loan guarantee.

The memo, sent shortly after the Dec. 2, 2015, call, also “outlined the trip’s agenda and addressed several questions regarding US policy toward Ukraine.”…”

If you think Democrat lawfare relating to the election doesn’t exist, I’ve got some great polls to show you.

Appeals Court Reinstates Alabama Election Laws Blocked by District Judge Appointed by Pres. Obama

 

Hunter Biden introduced Joe Biden to senior Burisma executive in 2015 while receiving pay from Burisma. Joe has previously denied involvement in son’s business activities.

https://twitter.com/kayleighmcenany/status/1316357880052883456

More information here:

‘Smoking Gun’ Emails Show Hunter Biden Introduced VP Dad To Burisma Executive

Best of Trump

Great video of a rally getting started below

Dancing at the end of a rally

Hat tip to Kane

Susan Collins a “No” on Barrett

“…Senator Susan Collins says she will vote against Judge Amy Coney-Barrett being elected to the Supreme Court. “It’s not a comment on her. It is a comment on the process of rushing through a nomination in such a short time before a presidential election…”

I believe she is in a tight reelection race. She must think this improves her chances.

Original

Remarkable therapy for degenerative Parkinson’s

Deep Brain Stimulation

Sen Kennedy refers to “butthead professor” in question to Barrett

Senator Kennedy is great

Related:

Trump on recent Biden gaffes

I do agree with Biden on something

Thoughts on the Amy Barrett confirmation hearing – day 2

The hearing is a lot better today. Reasonable questions from Senators Graham and Feinstein. Feinstein is off in the emotional weeds, but so far questions have been appropriate and reasonable. Amy Barrett is obviously outstanding. She has a comprehensive knowledge of the law and factors affecting judges.

I think the senate confirmation hearings have become theater. Politicians use the hearings for their own purposes and distort what should be a straight forward and short process.

Amy Barrett should be confirmed by 90 plus votes. If not, the system is overly politicized and broken.

The tech giants are too big. Government action is required.

Justice ready to charge Google with monopoly search practices

“…Insiders expect the Justice Department to charge Google with violating antitrust laws this week, in what would be the biggest such action against a U.S. tech company in two decades. But questions still swirl around how broad and tight Justice’s case will be.

Why it matters: The suit against Google will focus on monopolistic behavior, but it’s also likely to be the last chance for the Trump Administration to act against the tech giants it blames for anti-conservative bias before an election that could oust it.

Where it stands: The case is expected to focus on allegations of competitive abuses related to search.

    • The Justice Department and a group of state attorneys general have also been investigating Google’s advertising business. One remedy proposal under discussion is to require Google to sell off its Chrome browser, Politico reports.

Between the lines: Proving today’s tech giants are monopolists who cause consumer harm is challenging since companies like Google give most of their ad-supported services away for free.

The intrigue: In a sprawling report released last week, House Democrats made the case that Google does in fact hold a harmful monopoly in search.

    • They contended the company uses its existing market dominance, control of the Android operating system and financial and technological might to quash competition, thereby denying consumers the benefits of a healthy search market.
    • Some Republican lawmakers who worked on the congressional investigation objected to the report, in part because they wanted it to focus on allegations of bias.
    • It’s still unclear just how the DOJ will make its case, but they may end up making arguments similar to the House report, despite the partisan gulf between Democratic lawmakers and a GOP administration…”

Ted Cruz on Democrat attacks against Barrett

Line for Trump event in Florida yesterday

Doug Santo