Best of Trump

Great video of a rally getting started below

Dancing at the end of a rally

Hat tip to Kane

Susan Collins a “No” on Barrett

“…Senator Susan Collins says she will vote against Judge Amy Coney-Barrett being elected to the Supreme Court. “It’s not a comment on her. It is a comment on the process of rushing through a nomination in such a short time before a presidential election…”

I believe she is in a tight reelection race. She must think this improves her chances.

Original

Remarkable therapy for degenerative Parkinson’s

Deep Brain Stimulation

Sen Kennedy refers to “butthead professor” in question to Barrett

Senator Kennedy is great

Related:

Trump on recent Biden gaffes

I do agree with Biden on something

Thoughts on the Amy Barrett confirmation hearing – day 2

The hearing is a lot better today. Reasonable questions from Senators Graham and Feinstein. Feinstein is off in the emotional weeds, but so far questions have been appropriate and reasonable. Amy Barrett is obviously outstanding. She has a comprehensive knowledge of the law and factors affecting judges.

I think the senate confirmation hearings have become theater. Politicians use the hearings for their own purposes and distort what should be a straight forward and short process.

Amy Barrett should be confirmed by 90 plus votes. If not, the system is overly politicized and broken.

The tech giants are too big. Government action is required.

Justice ready to charge Google with monopoly search practices

“…Insiders expect the Justice Department to charge Google with violating antitrust laws this week, in what would be the biggest such action against a U.S. tech company in two decades. But questions still swirl around how broad and tight Justice’s case will be.

Why it matters: The suit against Google will focus on monopolistic behavior, but it’s also likely to be the last chance for the Trump Administration to act against the tech giants it blames for anti-conservative bias before an election that could oust it.

Where it stands: The case is expected to focus on allegations of competitive abuses related to search.

    • The Justice Department and a group of state attorneys general have also been investigating Google’s advertising business. One remedy proposal under discussion is to require Google to sell off its Chrome browser, Politico reports.

Between the lines: Proving today’s tech giants are monopolists who cause consumer harm is challenging since companies like Google give most of their ad-supported services away for free.

The intrigue: In a sprawling report released last week, House Democrats made the case that Google does in fact hold a harmful monopoly in search.

    • They contended the company uses its existing market dominance, control of the Android operating system and financial and technological might to quash competition, thereby denying consumers the benefits of a healthy search market.
    • Some Republican lawmakers who worked on the congressional investigation objected to the report, in part because they wanted it to focus on allegations of bias.
    • It’s still unclear just how the DOJ will make its case, but they may end up making arguments similar to the House report, despite the partisan gulf between Democratic lawmakers and a GOP administration…”

Ted Cruz on Democrat attacks against Barrett

Line for Trump event in Florida yesterday

There are good people in government. Chuck Grassley is one.

Real Clear Politics averages for select battleground states 2016 vs 2020

https://twitter.com/SunshineSt8Sam/status/1315120044192468996

https://twitter.com/SunshineSt8Sam/status/1315120053478739968

https://twitter.com/SunshineSt8Sam/status/1315120062219653120

Doug Santo