Images | Commentary | Digital Scrapbook
"All I was watching was CNN so I had a lot of hate for @realDonaldTrump. One day I decided to say: You know what I dont know much abt him so let's go & pray. When I did, God opened my heart & that's how I became a big fan."
"Now I have 47 ppl close to me who are voting for him!" pic.twitter.com/QrDA0m78z9
— Black Voices For Trump 2024 (@BlackVoices4DJT) October 29, 2020
Related:
https://twitter.com/downtownmomnyc/status/1321834534992777222
Rudy is not messing around anymore. Jesus.
This is straight Dragon-Energy, Tiger-Blood shit. https://t.co/h33hhc1gw7— MonsieurAmerica (@MonsieurAmerica) October 29, 2020
In 2016, pollsters Arie Kapteyn and Robert Cahaly saw Trump coming. In 2020, they see polls again underestimating his support.
Go Trump-Hearse!
Oct 29, 2020 – Morning Reader Data Points:
"If the presidential election was held today, would you vote for Donald Trump or Joe Biden?"
National Daily Black Likely Voter % For @POTUS – October 26-29, 2020
Mon 10/26 – 27%
Tue 10/27 – 30%
Wed 10/28 – 30%
Thu 10/29 – 31%— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) October 29, 2020
If true, a real game changer.
Democrat nightmare.
The looney left has captured our education system and is destroying it.
.@Nigel_Farage: I think President @realDonaldTrump is going to win on Tuesday pic.twitter.com/FgPB4j9NWl
— The National Pulse (@TheNatPulse) October 29, 2020
Media continues to disgrace itself collectively and individually
That really sums up Biden’s campaign.
The media in this country is a biased, agenda-driven, unprofessional disgrace. When I think they have hit absolute rock-bottom personally and professionally, they manage to further disgrace themselves and their profession.
They think you are stupid and they don’t care if you know it.
“…PHILADELPHIA, PA—Protests over racial injustice erupted in Philly, and not a moment too soon: local man Michael Parsons was getting behind on his Christmas shopping.
“Well, this is convenient,” he said as he saw people were protesting the shooting of a man who was just one knife away from being unarmed. He grabbed his balaclava, a sign reading “INJUSTICE ANYWHERE IS A THREAT TO JUSTICE EVERYWHERE,” and a shopping cart, and headed out the door.
“Justice for whoever it was!” he cried as he made a stop at Best Buy and picked up an iPad for his mom and all six Star Wars movies on Blu-ray for his brother. “And you know what? I’m gonna treat myself,” he added as he threw a few Xbox games into his cart for himself.
“Uh, police are bad or whatever!” he quickly added as he made his way to Target for some stocking stuffers.
According to sources, Parsons is hoping there’s another police shooting sometime before Christmas, as he forgot to pick up an HDMI cable…”
Austin Bay:
“…On Oct. 26, the Washington Free Beacon published a hard-hitting investigative article exposing a truly appalling and destructive example of communist China’s long-term war on free societies, in this case using influence and information as weapons.
The Free Beacon detailed The Economist magazine’s years of “sympathetic” coverage of China’s Huawei Technologies company. Then the report connected information to a kind of influence by documenting the magazine’s profitable business relationship with the notorious corporate giant. The Free Beacon noted The Economist did not acknowledge that economic relationship for nearly a decade.
Huawei’s deep financial and operational connections to the Chinese Communist Party are no secret. The CCP has final say over Huawei’s international operations. That indicates the CCP was a silent partner in the Huawei-Economist arrangement.
According to the Free Beacon report, written by Yuichiro Kakutani, from 2012 through 2018, the Economist Intelligence Unit (the magazine’s consulting division) published at least seven Huawei-commissioned reports the company used to “advance its policy agendas and deflect cybersecurity concerns raised by Western governments.” Huawei credited the reports with influencing British broadband and communications policy.
But here’s the damning quote that implicates the news and editorial divisions. The magazine itself had “defended Huawei in a front-page cover story in 2012 — the year the publication’s consulting division started working with the company.” Titled “Who’s afraid of Huawei?” the story “accused Western countries of using cybersecurity concerns as a pretense to oppose legitimate competition from Huawei.”…
…The Free Beacon’s bottom-line accusation: Chinese money bought advantageous (euphemized) treatment, if not favorable news coverage and a positive editorial attitude in a news and business journal long regarded as one of the world’s most influential — influential in terms of its editorial acumen, erudite reporting and savvy story selection. The Economist’s international subscriber base is well educated, wealthy and connected…
…From the Chinese perspective, Hunter Biden’s alleged business deals in China would classify as an effort to influence an individual leader.
Congratulations to the Washington Free Beacon for documenting how corrosive and effective China’s influence operations can be…”
The looney left has captured our education system and is destroying it.
“…If The New York Times was willing to lie about its anonymous source for their high-profile information operation, imagine the lies they’re willing to tell about all the other anonymous sources they use…”
“These absentee ballots will not be counted if it cannot be confirmed from the Intelligent Mail barcode that the ballot was mailed on or before the date of the relevant election,” Judge William W. Eldridge IV wrote.
