Liberal jurisprudence…

The judicial Calvinball of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson

“…Jackson’s sense of liberation has increasingly become the subject of consternation on the court itself, as she unloads on her colleagues in strikingly strident opinions.

Most recently, Jackson went ballistic after her colleagues reversed another district court judge who issued a sweeping injunction barring the Trump Administration from canceling roughly $783 million in grants in the National Institutes of Health.

Again writing alone, Jackson unleashed a tongue-lashing on her colleagues, who she suggested were unethical, unthinking cutouts for Trump. She denounced her fellow justices, stating, “This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this administration always wins.”…

…In Jacksonian jurisprudence, it often seems like there are no fixed rules, only fixed outcomes. She then attacks her colleagues for a lack of integrity or empathy.

To quote Calvin, Jackson proves that “there’s no problem so awful that you can’t add some guilt to it and make it even worse.”…

…Jackson’s jurisprudence is the very model of a judiciary untethered from constitutional or institutional restraints. Not surprisingly, she is lionized in law schools for her rejection of judicial restraint and her pursuit of progressive outcomes. Yet, her approach is becoming increasingly lawless…”

Higher education: skin color as a primary qualification for hiring…

George Mason President Implemented Illegal Race-Based Hiring Schemes, Education Department Finds.

You can’t make it up.

DEI – Didn’t earn it.

Democrats…

Judge Releases Illegal Migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia, ‘Maryland Man’

Related:

Noem: Release Of ‘Monster’ Illegal Alien Abrego Garcia ‘A New Low’

NASA has drifted to oblivion from it’s heyday with Kranz, Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins, Lovell, etc. Can it come back?

Acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy says the agency will ‘move aside’ from climate sciences to focus on exploring moon and Mars.

Democrats and media hated Bolton until he became a Trump critic. That tells you all you need to know about Dem/media reactions…

Pundits Loved Mar-A-Lago Raid, Melt Down Over Bolton

Democrats…

Here’s this jerkoff solving the homeless problem – since 2008 and still going:

More Democrats:

 

 

 

 

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Delusional. Without leadership. Absolutely lost.

The left is clueless. Stupid is probably more accurate. Just stupid…

Eugene Robinson: Aligning The Smithsonian With Trump’s View Of History Would Be “An Obscenity,” A Denial Of Our History

Aligning it with your view is good though.

You can’t make it up.

Headline of the day…

Dems Furious at Trump for Stopping All DC Homicides

Close runner up:

Gay Satanist Rapper Arrested, Hospitalized After Half-Naked Assault on Officers

Democrats.

Observe the racism inherent in the Democrat Party. 1860 – 2025…

Racist White VA Democrat SHOCKS Country Holding Straight-Up JIM CROW Sign to Protest Winsome Earle-Sears.

California judges know better than the U.S. Supreme Court…

CA court shrugs off SCOTUS; Impact fees still constitutional

“…A California appeals court has reaffirmed its position that a $23,420 traffic impact fee applied to an 1,800-square-foot home does not run afoul of the Constitution’s Takings Clause, even though the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year tightened the rules on such fees…

…At issue is whether a legislative body, such as El Dorado County’s elected supervisors, were exempt from takings rules imposed by legal precedent. In its first ruling in the case, the appeals court concluded there was a legislative exemption, but in April the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected that idea.

“… There is no basis for affording property rights less protection in the hands of legislators than administrators,” Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the court in April. “The Takings Clause applies equally to both – which means that it prohibits legislatures and agencies alike from imposing unconstitutional conditions on land-use permits.”

The high court vacated the first appeals court ruling and remanded it back to the court for further deliberations. But last month, the California court reaffirmed its first decision, finding that the traffic impact fees were constitutional despite the higher scrutiny advanced by the U.S. Supreme Court…”

Doug Santo