Images | Commentary | Digital Scrapbook
Upcoming interview. You know that Trump filmed this in real time using his people in case NBC tries to deceptively edit it. Trump should release the full video “preemptively” to help NBC find their inner journalism.
Garbage media can’t stop the iconic and they hate him because of it:
“…No voting irregularities found, yet results are wiped out…”
Sure, and I believe that too.
“…certain aspects of the presidential pardoning power are so well-established that it is unlikely that any Court, conservative or liberal, will revisit them. For starters the power is extremely broad; it is vested by the Constitution in the president, and there is little that Congress can do to constrain it short of impeaching the president if they believe its exercise improper.
Although the Constitution speaks of “reprieves” and “pardons,” these words encompass more than what they might seem to entail. “Pardons,” for example, encompass amnesties and can be accorded people whose identities the president does not know and may be unable to determine. The first such pardon was issued in 1795 by George Washington to people who participated in the Pennsylvania Whiskey Rebellion, with Jimmy Carter’s pardon of Vietnam-era draft evaders being a more recent example. Pardons may also be conditioned on a person accepting certain restrictions on future behavior, including submitting to punishments not otherwise provided by law. Pardons need not follow convictions but can be issued before or during a criminal prosecution. The rationale for so-called “pre-emptive” pardons is that there is no point in requiring a person to live in fear of conviction or to go through a trial if the offense of which he is or might be accused would ultimately be pardoned. Pre-emptive pardons do, not, however apply to offenses not yet committed. The president can tell a thief not to worry about being convicted for the crime he has committed yesterday because he has pardoned him. But a pardon today cannot forgive a crime the thief commits tomorrow…”
“…Testimony and video from the day showed Babbitt being pushed through a door window into the House Speaker’s Lobby behind the House floor when, without warning, she was shot by Byrd. The shooting was investigated, but no charges were leveled, and Byrd was promoted. In addition to the promotion from lieutenant, Just the News reported this week that House Democratic leaders pressured the Capitol Police to give Byrd a $37,000 retention bonus, help with $160,000 in private fundraising, and housing. Meanwhile, the 115-pound Babbitt, who was 36 when shot, has been savaged in the liberal media…”
Biden better get started on preemptive pardons. It looks like that is going to be a big job.
Related. Change can’t come too soon. We’re heading down to the wire:
They laugh at the suckers in garbage media and the fools that vote for Democrats no matter what. They laugh at them because they hate them for naivete and for their stupidity and because it makes them feel better about themselves.
Biden is not a good man. He used his son Hunter. He set Hunter up to take the fall. He lied to the world about his corruption. He is an ugly, abusive, manipulative personality.
This is terrible.
I suppose it could have been worse.
He should have been acquitted of all charges.
A small and quiet voice tells me Democrats are on the jury and are hopelessly confused.
Just when you thought liberal Supreme Court justices could not have dumber arguments than K.B. Jackson, Sotomayor steps up to the plate and says hold my beer.
“…I’m sorry, Counselor,” she said, interrupting him. “Every medical treatment has a risk, even taking aspirin, there is always going to be a percentage of the population under any medical treatment that’s going to suffer a harm…”
Cutting off the healthy breasts and genitals of minors is just like taking aspirin, same minimal risk.
Personally, I don’t think Democrats choose the best and brightest. They choose people based on identity, skin color, sexual preference, gender, and willingness to stick to lefty policies no matter how outrageous or embarrassing for themselves or others.
Pure stupidity.
How in the world can Sotomayor influence the conservative justices on the court with an argument like that?
Democrats shoot themselves in the foot again.
Walter Russell Mead:
“…How Reagan-Bush Republicans awakened the Balrogs of economic, immigration, and identity politics that Donald Trump used to crush them…”
Willful political incompetence
