NCLA Asks Federal Court to Halt Illegitimate U.S. Dep’t of Transportation Administrative Proceeding
“…DOT has hauled gh Testing into its in-house tribunals, where agency officials violate the due process of law by acting as both prosecutor and adjudicator. DOT’s in-house administrative adjudicators are further illegitimate under Article II of the Constitution because they are not appointed by the President or DOT Secretary and are improperly shielded from presidential removal. Such tribunals cannot exercise judicial power to adjudicate DOT’s claims because Article III of the Constitution vests such power exclusively in federal courts. Finally, DOT’s in-house proceedings run afoul of the Seventh Amendment by depriving gh Testing of its right to a jury trial.
NCLA has established a strong track record fighting unconstitutional adjudication regimes within the Administrative State, including at DOT. In January, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit vacated a PHMSA-imposed civil penalty against another NCLA client, Polyweave Packaging, Inc., after the agency admitted its chief adjudicator was not constitutionally appointed. PHMSA ultimately dismissed its case against Polyweave in May. That decision did not erase the harm caused by the agency’s profound disregard for the Constitution, a pattern that currently threatens gh Testing…
…“Suppose you are accused of breaking a law and are prosecuted. But instead of a judge and jury, the chief of police presides over your trial and decides your fate. Americans would rightly recognize such an affair to be profoundly unjust and an affront to the Constitution. Yet, DOT and other administrative agencies routinely act as prosecutor, judge, and jury against Americans whom they accuse of breaking the law. That must stop now.”…”
Related:
