Trump impeached for being right about Biden family’s Ukraine corruption

Here are some of the best examples of media hackery about the Burisma-Biden scandal that aged like fine milk.

1. The New York Times

2. The Washington Post

3. The New Yorker

Many more at the link.

 

In major shift, RFK Jr. calls for corruption investigation of Joe Biden

“…Presidential candidate says release of FBI informant memo last week escalated his concern…”

The Federalist was asked by NewsGuard to respond to its concerns we are ‘inaccurate and misleading’ — so we did. Proudly and publicly.

“…Vercellone and everyone else involved in these rackets have convinced themselves they’re performing a valuable public service fighting “misinformation” that nearly always conveniently aligns with ideological priors, but I’m not sure they’ve had anyone be blunt: Between her time as a “fact checker” and her new gig at NewsGuard, Vercellone is a censor pure and simple. The business model she’s participating in is to make a profit by narrowing the range of acceptable opinions…”

As scientists ramp up their fantasies about fabricated female gametes, concerns about technology outpacing our humanity should be high.

Transgender Interventions Harm Children

“…No Evidence that Transgender Interventions are Safe for Children. There is not a single long-term study to demonstrate the safety or efficacy of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries for transgender-believing youth. This means that youth transition is experimental, and therefore, parents cannot provide informed consent, nor can minors provide assent for these interventions. Moreover, the best long-term evidence we have among adults shows that medical intervention fails to reduce suicide…”

Israel passes Israel judicial reform; police crack down on protesters

Biz partner: Hunter put Joe on the phone “dozens of times”

Hunter Biden put then-VP dad Joe on the phone with business associates at least 2 dozen times, ex-partner Devon Archer to testify

“…Hunter Biden would dial in his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, on speakerphone into meetings with his overseas business partners, according to testimony expected before Congress this week from Devon Archer, the first son’s former best friend…”

Retract “Proximal Origin?” No, says Nature Medicine editor

“…The scientific paper “Proximal Origin of SARS-Cov-2,” which was commissioned by Anthony Fauci in order to debunk the lab leak theory of COVID’s origins, has been essentially debunked.

By that, I don’t mean its conclusions have been proven wrong–although by now we all have adequate reasons to believe that they are likely wrong–but rather that the paper itself is a bunch of propaganda written at the behest of the government by pliable scientists who depended upon Fauci for funding, and who clearly did not believe that what they were writing was true. They were engaged in self-conscious fraud.

We now have contemporaneous Slack messages and emails where the authors not only express doubts that what they were writing was true, but that prove they thought that the claim they were making–that COVID arose naturally without human interference and that it spread from an animal to a human being via natural processes–was likely not true.

For instance, the highest profile author of the paper Kristian Andersen wrote this to a colleague during the editing of the paper:

Andersen wrote that “the main issue is that accidental release is in fact highly likely—it’s not some fringe theory. I absolutely agree that we can’t prove one way or the other, but we never will be able to—however, that doesn’t mean that by default the data is currently much more suggestive of a natural origin as opposed to e.g. passage. It is not—the furin cleavage site is very hard to explain”—referring to a feature of the virus that concerned the scientists at the time.

Here are some of the things the scientists were saying to each other as they wrote a paper that purported to prove a lab leak was unlikely and gain-of-function had nothing to do with COVID’s origins.

It certainly looks like Fauci funded scientists adjusted their thinking at Fauci’s request to provide the basis for a preferred narrative. A narrative that protected Fauci and his cohorts from potential personal and professional liability. I suppose if Fauci was funding my research to the tune of millions of taxpayer dollars in grants, I may be inclined to give his preferred narrative serious consideration. It was the censorship, the moral suasion (if you disagree with us you are morally below us), the coordination with garbage media, social media, etc. to censure that makes it so bad. Bad and really disgusting.

Experts warn that Tik Tok trend of eating borax is highly dangerous

Probably don’t want to light yourself on fire either.

Wrap Tinfoil Around Your Doorknob to Keep Eco-Doom Nutjobs Away: 56 Years of Climate Codswallop That Never Happened

The definitive list of climate kook predictions that never happened:

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions

James Comer doesn’t want a special counsel

Congressional Republicans are doing fine.

The journal “Lancet” published the chart on left with unequal Y-Axis to downplay fact that cold causes 10X more deaths than heat in Europe. Björn Lomborg corrected this with chart on right.
This is disgraceful for a supposedly scientific journal. pic.twitter.com/yG6guLQwyT

— Patrick Moore (@EcoSenseNow) July 23, 2023

They think you are stupid.

Rationalizing fakery doesn’t work:

This was clearly deceptive on purpose. It radically changes the visual impression the sides make. Setting the heat side to only go 1-50 would have helped visibility, and it would have still make it apparent that heat deaths are NOT the issue.

But the narrative needs heat death.

— Vince Westin 🇺🇸☮️🧪 (@VinceWestin) July 23, 2023

Below is the same thing as the chart fakery:

IMF cancels Nobel prize winning climate skeptic

FBI Carried Out Warrantless Monitoring on Man Who Posted Guns for Sale on Facebook

Of course, the CDC is fighting back:

CDC Changed Definition of Breakthrough COVID-19 After Emails About ‘Vaccine Failure’

Like a battle of drunks rolling around in the gutter, the FBI comes back with a new low:

FBI used FISA improperly on U.S. Senator

USWNT players largely silent during national anthem in 2023 World Cup opener against Vietnam, who proudly sang theirs

First, They Came for Your Gas Stove. Now They’re Coming for Your Hot Water Heater

State Bar Examiner Resigns Because ‘NextGen Bar Exam Is Complete Abandonment Of Competence As Standard’ For New Lawyers

Related:

Military Notes a Spike in Myocarditis Cases — Wonder Why?

Analytics show Democrats twice as radical, GOP more moderate.

Democrat Rep. Rosa DeLauro comes unglued during a committee hearing and says Republicans are "terrorists" for disagreeing with her pic.twitter.com/iicvCRq53o

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 18, 2023

“…To hear Democrats talk about Republicans, it’s pretty easy to get the impression that they are all right-wing rabble-rousers made more conservative after the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump.

The top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), for example, this week ranted about having to work with unbending “terrorists” across the aisle.

“You are negotiating with terrorists,” screeched DeLauro, her hair streaked a trendy blue, at all her Republican counterparts. “Members on your side, I will continue to call out the harm you are doing in this process, both in what these bills propose to do and in your approach on how we treat one another,” she added, angered that the GOP wanted to temper freebies to liberal LGBT outfits.

But it’s not the Republicans who have radicalized over the past 50 years, but the Democrats, and by a huge margin, according to a deep dive into the latest CPAC ratings…”