Minneapolis’ plight: A law-enforcement shortage in the center of “abolish the police”
Democrats.
We live in the age of stupid.
Democrats.
We live in the age of stupid.
Shut up and follow orders!
“…By now, anyone who doesn’t know that polls are tools for manipulating public opinion, not for discovering what public opinion is, simply hasn’t been paying attention. And when poll results are published under the headline “The Big Lie: Over half of Republicans believe Donald Trump is the actual President of the United States,” it’s clear that we’re not dealing with honest brokers. With the recent news out of Arizona, Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire, it’s clear that to believe that the 2020 presidential election was hardly the freest and fairest in American history is far from falling for a Big Lie. And that’s just the beginning of this poll’s dishonesty.
A research firm called Ipsos conducted the poll on behalf of Thomson Reuters. Ipsos bills itself as “the world’s third largest Insights and Analytics company,” and claims to “provide true understanding and powerful insights into the actions, opinions and motivations of citizens, consumers, patients, customers or employees.” However, Ipsos was accused of “systematic” and “massive” liberal bias in its polling during the 2016 presidential campaign, and there is no indication that it has mended its ways since then. On the basis of its “Big Lie” poll, instead of ridding itself of its biases, it is doubling down on them…
…But it’s clear that Ipsos isn’t about revealing. It’s about concealing. This poll is designed to conceal the fact that very few Americans are genuinely worried about this phantom menace of white supremacist terror that we hear so much about except in terms of genuine white supremacists committing actual terrorist attacks. It fudges its categories so that people who are concerned about jihad violence, antifa and Black Lives Matter violence, and “white supremacist” violence are all lumped together in a way that gives the impression that “white supremacists” and “gun nuts” are what most Americans are worried about. And those just happen to be the Democrats’ two primary targets today. What a coincidence.”…”
Democrats will not be distracted from their intense focus on nonsense.
Democrats.
What next?
We live in the age of stupid.
https://youtu.be/ysBScABOuVc
If you want to get vaccinated do it.
Don’t try to force your preference on others.
It is a long rehash of the media’s duplicity on the origin of the China Virus. It is really good. I encourage you to click over and go through it for a few minutes.
The media in this country is a disgusting joke, with few exceptions.
For reference, here's the legislation that people are saying a lot about, but it's best to just read it yourself 👇https://t.co/2eQI2pfxuJ
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) May 24, 2021
https://twitter.com/NautPoso/status/1396990049468682248
AOC is in therapy. https://t.co/1RejXZXrti
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) May 25, 2021
Hat tip to Kane
https://youtu.be/5-hy8LaThqM
According to Democrats and lefty media it is now unpatriotic to question election results.
The Biden administration says the border is closed.
If you believe that, you probably think Jimmy Hoffa died of natural causes. #BorderCrisis pic.twitter.com/EvDSxWohQ5
— John Kennedy (@SenJohnKennedy) May 24, 2021
Related:
Biden grants ‘immigration status’ to 100,000 illegal Haitians
Democrats will import as many illegals as required to dilute the conservative vote in this country. It is politics. Democrats think illegals will vote for them if they offer free entrance and free stuff
The new racism. It’s okay because, shut up!
Jonathan Turley:
“…on the recent decision of a federal judge that the Biden Administration was engaged in racial and gender discrimination in the administration of the pandemic relief under the American Rescue Plan Act. It is a question that is now being raised in a variety of federal programs under the Biden Administration.
President Biden has spoken out often, eloquently and passionately against the “ugly poison” of discrimination and racism in our government. So a ruling by a federal district court in Texas this week was particularly jarring: Judge Reed O’Connor found that the Biden administration engaged in systemic gender and race discrimination to implement COVID-19 relief for American restaurants. Café owner Philip Greer had claimed in a lawsuit against the Small Business Administration (SBA) that, while white, he needs the same rescue as minority restaurateurs under the newly enacted American Rescue Plan Act.
Greer’s Ranch Café reportedly lost over $100,000 during the pandemic. Like many restaurateurs, Greer was delighted to hear about the Restaurant Restoration Fund approved by Congress. However, he soon learned that, due to his race, he could not be considered until other applicants were allowed to seek funds. The White House and the Democratic-controlled Congress insisted that various groups should be first in line, including women, minorities and “socially and economically disadvantaged” people.
The government confirmed that $2.7 billion already has been distributed through the fund and that there are almost 150,000 pending applications from owners with preferential treatment. As a result, owners like Greer fear not just delayed payments but the exhaustion of the $28.6 billion allocated under the program. The SBA confirms it already has requests for $65 billion in payments under the fund.
The Biden administration agreed that such classifications, particularly based on race, must satisfy the highest constitutional burden of “strict scrutiny.” That means such classifications are unconstitutional unless they are “narrowly tailored” to serve a “compelling governmental interest.” However, the Justice Department cited studies that women and minorities historically have fewer lender resources and, before the pandemic, often were less likely to receive credit. There is ample support for that claim. The legal question is whether historical disparities are enough to justify a system of race and gender preferences when all restaurants were impacted by the pandemic.
In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that a minority set-aside program in Virginia was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause. The government cited historical barriers for minority enterprises, but the court balked. It noted that “identified discrimination” in the past “would give … government license to create a patchwork of racial preferences based on statistical generalizations about any field of endeavor.” When using racial classifications, the divided court stressed that “simply legislative assurances of good intention cannot suffice.”…”