Images | Commentary | Digital Scrapbook
https://youtu.be/Cf9DwmUMxFc
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1326272092401094656
Whistleblowers are only whistleblowers when they whistleblow the correct narrative. Otherwise they are disgruntled liars. Note the helpful warning from Twitter. Twitter thinks Americans are too stupid to understand the information.
Guess who they plan to censor.
Democrats and the MSM prove themselves unable to tell the truth, again, and again.
Longer version
Media can rant, scream, hide facts, ignore logic, ignore history, bully weak-minded peers, etc. They have ZERO credibility with Americans who intuitively understand error-riddled mail-in balloting schemes with little or no oversight make for a dangerously untrustworthy system.
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) November 10, 2020
Yep, he said that. pic.twitter.com/rw4rDmXO98
— The Recount (@therecount) November 10, 2020
Do you hear that dog that isn't barking? It's the top statistical experts on the left who are looking at election rigging allegations and coming to a slow boil in their own flop sweat.
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) November 10, 2020
https://youtu.be/g1wpw-axcFw
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1325841367944212480
2000-Gore refuses to concede & spends over a month in court challenges: HERO!
2018-Abrams refuses to concede for almost two weeks & challenges legitimacy of vote: HERO!
2020-Trump refuses to concede until allegations of voter fraud are resolved: UNDERMINING DEMOCRACY
— Razor (@hale_razor) November 6, 2020
“…I have expressed skepticism over the sweeping claims of fraud or that the current margins could be overcome with anything other than systemic flaws in the authentication of ballots. However, the demand for clear evidence of systemic violations after only a couple days of the tabulation stage is bizarre. We would not necessarily have such evidence, which is largely held by election officials. As expected, we have a series of localized affidavits and allegations of intentional fraud. Yet, network analysts were dismissing any and all allegations within the first 24 hours, as tabulations were continuing. It is like saying that a patient has a low white blood cell level but insisting on stopping testing if you cannot conclusively say that there is cancer. These initial allegations may or may not be indicative of a more systemic problem. There is no reason to presume fraud but also no reason to demand concessions before we look at these allegations, particularly with the addition of sworn statements and at least one computer problem resulting in loss of thousands of Trump votes in Michigan. Half of this country voted for Trump and it is not much for them to ask for a review of the challenges — a right that the Democrats would be demanding if the positions in this close election were reversed. Moreover, those voters can be understandably skeptical to hear these instant dismissals from networks, which previously predicted a sweeping victory for Biden and the Democrats. Even if, as expected, these allegations are rejected, it is important for this country to have a full and open consideration of these claims and the underlying evidence…”
https://youtu.be/knjjB8zzyao