In what universe does a fictional quote as part of an obvious joke constitute a genuine incitement to violence? How does context not come into play here? They're asking us to edit the article and not speak publicly about internal content reviews. Oops, did I just tweet this?
The Trump campaign is set to release this digital ad showing Democrat Joe Biden repeatedly getting angry when asked about his son's overseas business dealings pic.twitter.com/lMaTvQRl4j
The Trump campaign is set to release this digital ad highlighting the New York Post's explosive reporting on Hunter Biden's overseas business dealings and how the controversy is connected to Democrat Joe Biden pic.twitter.com/9sb0KBgQiI
1. “I was simply wrong about Donald Trump on policy.”
2. “I wasn’t really wrong about Donald Trump on character, but whatever damage he was going to do has already been done, and it’s not going to help if I don’t vote for him this time.”
3. “Most importantly, the Democrats have lost their [bleeping] minds.”
If this is fake, why don’t the Biden’s come out and say so? Why did Hunter Biden’s lawyer call The Mac Shop to get Hunter’s laptop back? If this is Russian disinformation how did the Russians get Hunter to sign the receipt? Forgery, you say, back to the first question.
Biden knows this is real. That is why Biden is limiting his exposure to questions and the public.
“…Pennsylvania ballots will be counted up to three days after Election Day, the Supreme Court ruled Monday in shooting down Republican opposition to the extension.
The 4-4 ruling by the court upholds a previous decision by the State Supreme Court that will allow ballots in the Keystone State to be counted up to Nov. 6, the Associated Press reported.
Ballots that don’t have clear postmarks will also be counted under the ruling.
Chief Justice John Roberts joined with three liberal members of the court in blocking the GOP’s challenge to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s previous ruling…”
“…Ritesh Lakhkar, a Program Manager for Google Cloud, came forward to expose the wrongdoing that’s taking place at the Big Tech company. According to Lakhkar, he disagrees “morally” and “ethically” with the way Google is failing to hold Democrats to the same standards as Republicans.
“If Trump wins, there will be riots. And if the left wins, they will be ecstatic,” he told Project Veritas.
Lakhkar raised concerns about the Big Tech giant “playing God” by “taking away freedom of speech” from those on both sides of the political aisle. Specifically, he cited tweets from President Donald Trump and lefty reporters being deleted.
“So, I’m like, you’re playing selective God. Like, if it was fraud it doesn’t matter, but for Trump, Melania Trump, it matters,” Lakhkar explained. “And, on the other side, Trump says something, misinformation. You’re gonna delete that because it’s illegal under whatever pretext. And if a Democratic leader says that, then you’re gonna leave it. So I’m like, okay, you’re not following one way or the other. You are just plain and simple trying to play God.”
The employee said the company, who owns YouTube, also “plays God” with that platform as well. They routinely decide what content to keep and what content to delete.
Lakhkar said YouTube acts as God when they’re “deleting all the controversial stuff. Deleting all the KKK stuff. Deleting all the anti-apartheid and anti-Semitism. All that stuff.”
While he agrees with getting rid of those things, Lakhkar said there’s a freedom of speech issue.
“Both sides need to get their opinion,” Lakhkar explained.
When a person does a Google search of “Donald Trump” the results are negative. When a search of “Joe Biden” comes up the results are positive. And that’s because of results are “skewed by the owners and drivers of the algorithm.”…”
Democrats have lost it. They see another election loss to Trump, and they simply cannot face it. Democrat losses could extend down ticket. They could loose the house.
The lamentations and wailing of 2016 could be dwarfed by the righteous believers in 2020.
