“…So, the Ukraine narrative has collapsed worse than Adam Schiff’s credibility because it was obvious that the alleged whistleblower (i.e. leaker) didn’t have first-hand knowledge of what he reported. In fact, the rules were changed in August, suspiciously close to the time he came forward, to allow second-hand knowledge to be used in whistleblower complaints. This is such an obviously phoney-baloney set-up that only someone as credulous as, well, pretty much anyone in the national media believe it.
So it became general knowledge that not having any first-hand knowledge does not make for a credible whistleblower complaint.
Guess what happened next?
You’re right, a *second* whistleblower has allegedly come forward. And, wouldn’t you know it, the lawyer is claiming that this whistleblower does have first-hand knowledge. Wow! What a fantastic coincidence! Just when the whistleblower criteria is settled in the public mind, Trump’s enemies pull one out of their ass that that precisely meets the now-known requirements.
If the rules were that whistleblowers had to be left-handed Lithuanian midgets who enjoyed eating pickles while wearing pink frilly dresses, you can be sure that somewhere, somehow, the Democrats would be able to dig one up. This is basically the same play they ran with Kavanaugh. When it became obvious that Christine Doctor Ford was pretty much lying her ass off, suddenly, a number of other “credible” witnesses suddenly materialized out of thin air, each one with a kinky Kavanagh story more unbelievably bizarre than the previous one, until finally they had Kavanaugh as the captain of a pirate ship doing rape runs up and down the eastern seaboard in between celebratory keggers…”