More “Fuck Joe Biden” chants from last weekend.

https://twitter.com/YouKnowMares/status/1441841785702129668

https://twitter.com/BeachyKeenBabe/status/1441081510573056001

https://twitter.com/breakonthru234/status/1442169193567186946

Not sure where this one was:

Karl Denninger on what the Maricopa Audit showed

On Maricopa

“…There may well be more here — but what’s been discoveredย thus farย and proved (and for which the evidence is now in the public domain) shows that:

1. The election in Maricopa County for federal offices, including President, was not conducted in accordance with Federal Law.

2. The results, basedย solelyย on the count of duplicated ballot envelopes (people who voted more than once), which exceeds the margin of victory for the Presidential Office,ย are not able to be confirmed since once duplicate ballots are removed from the envelopes it is impossible to identify them.ย  Maricopa county claimedย noย such duplicates exist.ย  We now knowย more than 17,000ย in fact do existย and the envelopes still exist.ย ย What we cannot prove one way or another is whether the ballotsย insideย those envelopes were counted and, if only one was counted,ย which one was counted.ย ย We thus haveย no way to knowย who won.

3. The personsย running the electionย have made materially false statementsย on an intentional basisย about the equipmentย neverย being connected to the Internet.

4. The personsย running the electionย bothย deliberatelyย destroyed data related to the election in direct violation of Federal Lawย and, as a separate and distinct offense,ย attempted to cover up that destruction and identification of the person who did so.ย  This act, standing alone, demonstratesย intentย to tamper with the election results.

5. The vast majority of said deliberately destroyed data was not recoverableย and likely is not recoverable.

Byย forensic evidence,ย not presented and unrebutted, the outcome of the election in Arizonaย was falsely certified.

What’s the remedy for this?

That’s a separate debate — but that thisย one county aloneย did in fact corrupt their election, did so intentionally, and did so in such a fashion thatย at this time it not possible to know what the result actually wasย is not subject to reasonable dispute…”

This is healthcare? This is liberal politics – petty tyrant bureaucrat edition.

Anyone who is sick withย any respiratory diseaseย in Alberta will be counted as a Covid case.

Psycho.

Related:

You want to know what this is about, watch this theatrical performance. Virtue signaling for liberal followers. This is religion, not science, not healthcare.

Related:

Hat tip to Kane

Massachusetts State Police resign in large numbers over vax mandate

Massachusetts police union says DOZENS of state troopers have quit over Gov. Charlie Baker’s COVID vaccine mandate

    • The State Police Association of Massachusetts filed a lawsuit in an attempt to delay the vaccine mandate enforced by Governor Charlie Baker
    • Dozens of members from the union have quit over the vaccine mandate
    • The mandate requires state workers to get the vaccination shot by October 17 or face possible termination
    • The request was denied by the Massachusetts Supreme Court on Thursday
    • SPAM president Michael Cherven said that the mandate may leave them short-staffed with 20% of the union being unvaccinated

Durham Probe reaches inside Biden White House

Biden Security Adviser Jake Sullivan Tied to Alleged 2016 Clinton Scheme to Co-Opt the CIA and FBI to Tar Trump

“…The ties between Joe Biden and Jake Sullivan, the White House Security Adviser now indicted by John Durhamโ€™s grand jury.

White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan figures prominently in a grand jury investigation run by Special Counsel John Durham into an alleged 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign scheme to use both the FBI and CIA to tar Donald Trump as a colluder with Russia, according to people familiar with the criminal probe, which they say has broadened into a conspiracy case.

Sullivan is facing scrutiny, sources say, over potentially false statements he made about his involvement in the effort, which continued after the election and into 2017. As a senior foreign policy adviser to Clinton, Sullivan spearheaded what was known inside her campaign as a โ€œconfidential projectโ€ to link Trump to the Kremlin through dubious email-server records provided to the agencies, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Last week, Michael A. Sussmann, a partner in Perkins Coie, a law firm representing the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of making false statements to the FBI about his clients and their motives behind planting the rumor, at the highest levels of the FBI, of a secret Trump-Russia server. After a months-long investigation, the FBI found no merit to the rumor.

The grand jury indicated in its lengthyย indictmentย that several people were involved in the alleged conspiracy to mislead the FBI and trigger an investigation of the Republican presidential candidateโ€”including Sullivan, who was described by his campaign position but not identified by name.

The Clinton campaign project, these sources say, also involved compiling a โ€œdigital dossierโ€ on several Trump campaign officialsโ€”including Lt. General Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, George Papadopoulos, and Carter Page. This effort exploited highly sensitive, nonpublic Internet data related to their personal email communications and web-browsing, known as Internet Protocol, or IP, addresses.

To mine the data, the Clinton campaign enlisted a team of Beltway computer contractors as well as university researchers with security clearance who often collaborate with the FBI and the intelligence community. They worked from a five-page campaign document called the โ€œTrump Associates List.โ€

The tech group also pulled logs purportedly from servers for a Russian bank and Trump Tower, and the campaign provided the data to the FBI on two thumb drives, along with three โ€œwhite papersโ€ that claimed the data indicated the Trump campaign was secretly communicating with Moscow through a server in Trump Tower and the Alfa Bank in Russia. Based on the material, the FBI opened at least one investigation, adding to several others it had already initiated targeting the Trump campaign in the summer of 2016.

The indictment states that Sussmann, as well as the cyber experts recruited for the operation, โ€œcoordinated with representatives and agents of the Clinton campaign with regard to the data and written materials that Sussmann gave to the FBI and the media.โ€

One of those campaign agents was Sullivan, according to emails Durham obtained. On Sept. 15, 2016โ€”just four days before Sussmann handed off the materials to the FBIโ€”Marc Elias, his law partner and fellow Democratic Party operative, โ€œexchanged emails with the Clinton campaignโ€™s foreign policy adviser concerning the Russian bank allegations,โ€ as well as with other top campaign officials, the indictment states.

The sources close to the case confirmed the โ€œforeign policy adviserโ€ referenced by title is Sullivan. They say he was briefed on the development of the opposition-research materials tying Trump to Alfa Bank, and was aware of the participants in the project. These included the Washington opposition-research group Fusion GPS, which worked for the Clinton campaign as a paid agent and helped gather dirt on Alfa Bank and draft the materials Elias discussed with Sullivan, the materials Sussmann would later submit to the FBI. Fusion researchers were in regular contact with both Sussmann and Elias about the project in the summer and fall of 2016. Sullivan also personally met with Elias, who briefed him on Fusionโ€™s opposition research, according to the sources.

Sullivan maintained in congressional testimony in December 2017 that he didnโ€™t know of Fusionโ€™s involvement in the Alfa Bank opposition research. In the same closed-door testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, he also denied knowing anything about Fusion in 2016 or who was conducting the opposition research for the campaign.

โ€œMarc [Elias] โ€ฆ would occasionally give us updates on the opposition research they were conducting, but I didnโ€™t know what the nature of that effort wasโ€”inside effort, outside effort, who was funding it, who was doing it, anything like that,โ€ Sullivan stated under oath…”

Worth clicking over for the whole thing

Doug Santo