Month: September 2020

Posted on

These people are Democrats – Gov. Cuomo: Trump had ‘better have an army’ to protect him if he comes to NYC. This is who they are. This is what they have.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Wednesday all but threatened President Trump’s safety if he returns to New York City in a rant responding to an exclusive story by The Post that Trump is looking to pull federal funds from “lawless” cities including New York.

Posted on

THE DEMOCRATS EXPLAIN THEIR VOTER FRAUD PLANS

John Hinderaker:

“…Democrats are not that much more afraid of the mild COVID virus than Republicans. Rather, fake Democratic ballots are far more likely to come in by mail, mysteriously mailed in by persons to whom they may or may not have been addressed–millions of those people being dead, moved away, or ineligible to vote. The “vote by junk mail” regime established in a number of states by the Democrats opens the door to voter fraud to an unprecedented degree. Which was, of course, the idea…

…Perhaps the most notable feature of this story is that a relatively prominent Democratic Party news outlet acknowledges it is likely that President Trump will “seem” to have won a landslide victory on Election Day, so that “weeks” of post-election fraud by the Democrats will be needed to throw the election into chaos. Will that happen? At the moment, it seems likely…”

Original

Posted on

Cancel culture coming for Dem VP candidate? Or more #MeToo type hypocrisy?

Kamala Harris ancestor was slave owner in Jamaica, her father says. Donald Harris says his roots go back to Hamilton Brown, an infamous, Irish-born, slave-owning British planter in Jamaica.

Woke Democrats just recommended canceling George Washington and removing the Washington monument.

How about Kamala? Does she get a pass?

If you believe any of this woke bullshit, the blame is on you.

Posted on

Democrat governance – California style. Time to move away from the crazies.

California imposes racial quotas on corporate boards

“…California’s legislature is mandating racial quotas for corporate boards. “Experts say” that “runs afoul of constitutional principles,” according to the Wall Street Journal. “New legislation passed over the weekend would mandate that publicly-traded companies headquartered in the state must have at least one director from a minority community by the close of 2021. There are more than 500 public companies based in California in the Russell 3000, which accounts for the vast majority of companies.”

By 2022, the quotas will increase. Firms will be required to have at least 3 minority directors if their board has 9 or more directors, or at least two minorities if their board has between 5 and 8 directors.

The legislation is indeed unconstitutional. The bill, AB-979, is described as promoting “racial diversity.”…”

Posted on

The mayor of Portland is a pathetic jerk. He is a Democrat.

Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler Smears Cop After Police Defended His Home

The Portland Police Bureau explained earlier Tuesday in a statement describing the riot:

A mass gathering devolved into a riot after individuals broke windows, burglarized a business, and lit a fire in an occupied apartment building…

[O]fficers observed someone throw burning material through a broken window into a ground-level business in a large, occupied apartment building. Out of concern that the fire could spread, causing an extreme life safety concern, the incident was declared a riot…

Over loudspeaker, participants in the gathering were told that the area was closed to all persons, including media and legal observers, to allow firefighters to respond and extinguish the fires. Few, if any, of the persons complied.

Officers began to move the crowd. Immediately officers reported rocks and paint balloons being thrown at them. Arrests were made. As the crowd moved away, some attempted to stack debris in the road to create barricades. Officers cleared them. At least one more dumpster was lit on fire.

Over the next couple of hours, officers continued to move rioters in an attempt to prevent them from reconvening at the site of the riot. More selective arrests were made when appropriate. By 2:00a.m., most of the participants in the gathering had left the area.

The “apartment building” in question was the home of the mayor himself.

Posted on

Democrat nightmare

Polls: Support for President Trump Surges in Black Community

“…If the polls are correct, the percentage of black voters who will cast ballots for Trump in 2020 could more than double from the eight percent he received in 2016.

An Emerson poll released on Monday found that 19 percent of black voters will vote for the president this November, while a Democracy Institute/Sunday Express poll released on Sunday also found the level of black support for the president at 19 percent, and a Zogby poll released on Monday showed 20 percent of black voters intend to vote for Trump instead of Biden…”

These are not conservative pollsters. That these results are out indicates to me that pollsters can no longer obfuscate the numbers by over-polling Democrats, question manipulation, or other tricks.

Posted on

Bottom story of the day

Nancy Pelosi Pleads Ignorance: Admits Hairdo, Blames Salon for Violation

Democrat.

Pelosi is a Democrat.

Rules don’t apply to her.

Other people are at fault for her actions.

You could program a computer to write these stories on Democrat petty tyrants, oops, I mean politicians.

Things like getting her hair done without complying with mask rules, make her feel like she is special and above the average citizen. Pathetic is what she is.

Posted on

Democrat candidate for President makes speech, quickly falls into to gibberish

I think this is what the Democrat candidate for President said:

“…Covid has taken this year, just since the outbreak, has taken more than 100 year, look, here’s, the lives, it’s just, It’s just, when you think about it…”

He also appears to be reading from a teleprompter.

Can the media cover for this guy until November? What happens when he faces Trump for the debates?

Keep him in the basement. Maybe voters won’t notice.

Posted on

On the charges against Kyle Rittenhouse – it looks like another case of Democrat justice, overcharging without regard to facts or law, because it feels good emotionally

Grant Baker:

“…prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows:

    • First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
    • First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
    • First degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
    • Attempt first degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
    • First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
    • Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

A detailed breakdown of the facts of the case can be found here. What follows is a breakdown of the law applicable to the case.

Counts 1, 3, and 4 relate to shots fired at Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gaige Grosskreutz respectively, all of whom are on film attacking Kyle Rittenhouse as he attempts to flee. Count 2 is ancillary to Count 1, relating to Daily Caller reporter Richard McGinnis, who was following Rosenbaum at the time of the incident and was therefore in Kyle’s line of fire. Count 5 refers to the two shots fired at the unknown male who attempted a jumping stomp on Kyle’s head after he tripped and fell while fleeing a violent mob. Both shots missed and the man fled the scene. Count 6 is an attempt to punish Kyle for merely having the gun.

The defense against Counts 1 to 5 will be Wisconsin’s broad self-defense laws. Citizens have no duty to flee when endangered (although Kyle did) and maintain self-defense privileges even if attacked by those one provokes (so long as the provocation did not include criminal entrapment). There is no duty to use the least possible force when threatened, only reasonable force, a standard judged by the person in question.  In other words, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Kyle Rittenhouse did not believe he had risk of great bodily harm and that the force he used was unreasonable according to Kyle’s own standards. Unlikely, given the facts of the case.

Additionally, both men killed by Rittenhouse had their hands on Kyle’s gun at the time of being shot, a detail confirmed by eyewitness Richard McGinnis and videos of the incident, making the men in possession of a gun. Both Rosenbaum and Huber were convicted felons and therefore may not possess firearms in Wisconsin. Bizarrely, even the charges mention that the men had grabbed Rittenhouse’s gun, undermining the prosecutors’ allegations. Worse yet, Gaige Grosskreutz, the third felon shot by Rittenhouse, had an illegal handgun drawn and pointed at Rittenhouse just before being shot. Grosskreutz later admitted through a third party that “his only regret was not killing the kid and hesitating to pull the gun before emptying the entire mag into him.” Grosskreutz has not been charged with a crime.

We are left with Count 6, illegal possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18. Kyle Rittenhouse is only 17, an open and shut case, right? Not quite. There is an exception for minors under 18 years of age armed with a rifle, which Kyle was indeed armed with. There are exceptions to this exception dealing with persons under 16 and hunting approvals, but neither are applicable in this case. Kyle Rittenhouse escapes this charge as well.

Considering the facts of the case and the state laws governing Wisconsin, it becomes clear that Kyle’s actions were not reckless — the prosecutor’s decisions were…”

Original

Doug Santo